I can tell you when a person is diagnosed with cancer, your world suddenly stops and you immediately think of your own mortality. Then you have to pull yourself together and deal with the reality of the situation.
One is usually under enough financial burden if you have a family, a house with a mortgage, bills to pay and maybe have insurance that doesn't quite pay for drugs that can run $8,000 per month. If you are the bread winner, you need to take time off from work for surgery and recovery. If you are a caregiver, you also might have to cut down on your work schedule to take care of your loved one. One thing that doesn't stop is the bills keep piling up.
I just wanted to share the story of one family who just experienced such a situation. This gentleman was diagnosed with stage 1 grade 2 kidney cancer that metastisied within a year and a half. He has a blog named The Enemy Returns and can be accessed at the following address: http://theenemyreturns.wordpress.com/
He is quite the battler going through the variety of treatments he as gone through. I would also say he is quite the inspiration.
He recently posted on his blog and also the ACOR KIDNEY support list that he was on the verge of losing his house since his family lost part of their income since he had to stop working full time for treatment and recovery and his wife also had to cut down on working to help take care of him and their family.
They fell behind in their mortgage payments and were trying unsuccessfully to restructure their mortgage to help them through this rough stretch until they could return to "normal". They were unsuccessful and their house was scheduled to go up for auction and they faced HOMELESSNESS.
Within 24 hours of posting his situation on the ACOR list, he received a call from his mortgage company's case manager who promptly told him that he sure does have allot of friends. Many members from the ACOR list contacted the mortgage company to voice their disapproval of how they were handling the situation. The end result was his mortgage is now restructured. His family does not face homelessness now.
TWO THUMBS UP for the family, his supporters and the mortgage company who changed their position and helped this family.
Unfortunately, I don't think many of these types of situations end this way but I'm glad it seems to be working out for this family.
I had an appointment this past Monday with a neurologist to get an opinion on my light headaches, dizziness and balance issues.
He started the exam by preforming a few diagnostic tests to check my mental status, sensory system, deep tendon reflexes, my coordination and gait. I thought I passed with flying colors.
We then went over the Brain MRI. This guy does it the right way. He pulled my study up on the screen and went over each series and explained what he was looking at and what he was looking for. I enjoyed learning a few things as it helps me understand but I find studies of my abdomen much more interesting. Everything looked normal including my inner ear and there were no signs of strokes or anything bad. I'd say that was a good thing since I'm sure there was a slight chance of mets which I was never concerned about since it was a long shot but I know my doctors had to exclude that diagnosis because of my past medical history and symptoms.
I received a diagnosis of migraine headaches. As far as receiving diagnosis, it sure does beat having a surgeon ask me what 189.0 is and receiving a letter in the mail confirming a diagnosis that I didn't receive in person to begin with. I thought that was odd since I've only had light and I mean light headaches and I never had to take an aspirin or anything. He explained that throbbing headaches are not necessary for migraine headaches and described a bunch of symptoms associated with migraine headaches. He mentioned chemical imbalance and abnormal seratonin levels. I asked if there were any serum tests to confirm seratonin levels and he said those tests are bascially only done at the NIH.
Its a basically grin and bear it type situation but he did offer a course of medications that I could try to try and alleviate the symptoms or possibly help eliminate them. I hate taking medication of any kind so I took a lets wait and see how this works out. All I have to do is send him a note and we'll try the medications for a short term trial to see if they work.
I'm learning to live with the symptoms. Just the other day I mowed my yard and was dizzy for two days afterward. The ringing in my ears comes and goes and its really just a nuisance. I don't give up easily and want to get more active. What did I do? I joined a local golf club the day after my appointment and I plan on playing golf amost every day. If I get dizzy, so what. If I stink, so what. I don't give up easily and I'm not knocking on heavens door yet so live goes on.
Overall, this appointment was a positive experience. The doctor and his staff were professional and pleasant to work with.
|
|
My brothers wedding was last Friday. I traveled to New York on Wednesday and managed to play golf with him and a couple of his friends Thursday morning at 6:50 am. I think this is the last time I ever play golf at 6:50 am. It was cold and windy but I don't often get the chance to play with my brother so I didn't mind one bit, besides, he treated me.
What can one say about a wedding other than it was a great occasion where two people share their love and devotion with friends and family and take that final step of making it official. The bride was absolutely stunning and the groom handsome (I had to say that since he is my brother and most people think we are twins which I just don't see).
The reception was held at Marina Del Rey which has a well deserved reputation for food and atmosphere. The cocktail hour alone had enough food which could have been considered a three course meal. The dinner was excellent. The band was pretty good and everyone had a great time.
It was a long day as the (men) bridal party met at 1:30 pm for some lunch and liquid refreshments. The wedding service was at 4:00 pm and the reception was from 7:00 pm until 1:00 am. I didn't get home until 2:00 am.
Congratulations Big Brother Michael and Little Sister Teresa!!!!!!
|
|
I had a Brain MRI done last week. This was done since I am experiencing intermittent light headaches, dizziness, balance issues and ringing in the ears.
I had the MRI performed locally at the Geisinger Grays Woods facility. This facility is only 15 minutes away from my house and it sure beats going to Danville which is almost 2 hours away.
As always, the technicians were pleasant and easy to work with. I experienced no anxiety as I don't mind getting scanned. This model of MRI was a little different than the model in Danville as there was a little more "head room". By "head room", I mean it isn't as snug a fit as the unit in Danville which has only about 2 inches of clearance from my face to the top of the unit. This unit didn't have that coffin feel as I like to keep my eyes open. The study took approximately 45 minutes as they injected contrast halfway through. I didn't even feel the needle being inserted into my arm for the contrast.
I guess the staff got reamed out as this is the first time I had to fill out a patient release form to get a copy of the study along with the radiologists report.
I would say it was good news as the opinion of the radiologist who read my study reported no abnormalities. I had the report within 24 hours of the study and my PCP's office called the day after I got the report to tell me my study was normal. I was actually impressed since it was the first time in a long time that they actually got something right.
I have an appointment with a neurologist coming up so we'll see what happens after that appointment.
One good thing is that I now have a baseline for future scans as I probably have almost everything covered, head, brain, bone, chest, abdomen and all the reports are pretty good. The only upcoming scans should be to check the post operative changes (pseudocyst), which I should have had already but thats another story and the regularly scheduled study to check the progress of my renal cryoablation.
|
|
|
I recently went on another cruise. This time the destination was the Panama Canal. I went with my best friend Bruce and his wife Gracie. Please see the cheesy pictures. The video is of the ship in the other set of locks. Locomotives are used to pull the ships through the locks.
I highly recommend anyone going on a cruise to browse the site www.cruisecritic.com. You can find information regarding anything and everything.
This was a 10 day cruise and when I first boarded the ship, 10 days seems like an eternity. As with every vacation, an eternity usually turns into "where the hell as the time gone".
As soon as I got settled into my room, I knew this cruise had the potential to be the cruise from hell. There was a memo in the room stating that the ship was just sanitized because of an outbreak of norvovirus.
Norovirus infection presents as vomiting and diarrhea and usually occurs in large outbreaks. It is usually transmitted via contaminated food or water or by direct person-to-person contact or by contact with contaminated objects. Not a pleasant situation when there are 2,400 people in an enclosed setting complete with buffet lines, sharing salt and pepper shakers in the dining rooms, public restrooms, the casino, etc......
The ship was on "red alert" as passengers were not allowed to serve themselves in the buffet lines. That was not a problem for me as I avoid buffets since I really don't like watching people rub their runny nose with their hand and then serve themselves in a buffet. In the dining room, there were no salt and pepper shakers on the tables. Bread baskets and butter were also missing from the table. All public restroom doors were open as they didn't want anyone touching the door knobs. The red alert lasted for the first three days and even though it was a hindrance, everyone knew it was necessary. Overall, I'd say they did a good job as from what they announced, only 3 or 4 people came down with norvovirus this particular cruise.
Bad Luck. The second night out was the first of two formal nights. We made reservations at one of the premium restaurants. The theme was Italian and the food was average at best. After the meal, Bruce started to feel ill. He thought it was food poisoning as a piece or two of seafood didn't taste right. Little did he know that he had contacted the norvovirus. He called the ships doctors the following morning after experiencing the not so pleasant symptoms. One of the nurses was in his room within 15 minutes and he was told he contacted the virus and they gave him an injection and he was then quarantined in the room for the next 48 hours. His room was cleaned 3 times a day by a hazmat team, complete gear including hazmat suits and masks. They also laundered all the clothes in the room gratis. It took about 4 days before Bruce recovered enough to be able to leave the room and ship.
The misfortune continued for Gracie as by the end of the cruise, she was under the weather herself as she had contacted strep throat and something else and still hasn't recovered some 10+ days later. I was fortunate and did not become ill.
Its a Small World. We arrived at the Panama Canal one morning at 6:00 am. The staff did a great job educating the passengers on the story of how the canals were built. There was a documentary that ran on the televisions that was very informative. There are a series of locks that the ship has to go through to make it to Gatun Lake. There are two sets of locks and another cruise ship was about 50 yards away from us. All of a sudden, I hear someone from the other cruise ship yelling my name. You got it, one of my friends was on the other ship. We ended up taking pictures of each other.
The World isn't Big Enough. One on the activities I enjoy is sharing a table in the dining room. You get to meet and chat with a wide variety of people living in different parts of the world and it makes dining interesting. However, one can't enjoy the company of everyone and I ran into one of those people during dinner one night. He happened to be a doctor who does research which includes an area of interest regarding the endocrine system and the pancreas. I didn't discuss any particulars of my case but did mention that I had islet cell. Out of the blue he asked me if I thought I knew more than my doctors. I thought great, I get enough arrogant bullshit from doctors I do see and I'm on vacation and this one is just as bad. I ignored his question and asked him if he thought all doctors were good. He thought for a second and said no. I told him I thought the same thing and told him that even though I can't judge their skills like he can, all I can do is ask questions so that I can make an informed decision. Needless to say, the conversation ended quickly. No harm, no foul but the world just doesn't seem big enough sometimes.
Entertainment. I was looking forward to this vacation since I wanted to play some more No Limit Texas Holdem. I brought a certain amount of cash to play with and over the course of being in the casino every night, the entertainment only ended up costing me $40. I ended up winning on the slots, breaking even on Texas Holdem and loosing in Blackjack although I only lost two $20 entry fees into tournaments.
I like calculating the odds in Texas Holdem and reading the people. This trip makes only the second time I've ever played Holdem and while I find it interesting reading people and trying to figure out what they have, I only have an interest in doing it while I'm on vacation. Its amazing how many people will fold when you raise them $25. I know I could not get away with that playing with real experienced players.
Out of the blue one night, the $5 blackjack table was blocked off with "Do Not Cross this Line" tape. The hazmat team came into the casino and cleaned the table. The men's lavatory just outside the casino also got blocked off. I guess somebody else became ill.
The shows were ok as the best show was the talent show put on by the cruise.
The food was ok and I didn't mind or am not embarrassed to order multiple entrées to try new things. One night the entire table was buzzing over a soup that was on the menu. Each person was scared to order it. I said what the heck and ordered it. The name of the soup was "Essence of Seafood". It was a cold soup and let me tell you, it was essence and it was the gamiest tasting soup I ever had. One spoonful and that was it. Needless to say, nobody else ordered it after that.
I didn't do many excursions off the ship because Bruce was sick but I did do kayaking in Costa Rica. They called it Costa Rica's version of the Amazon. Well it was 2 1/2 hours of paddling in 90 degree heat with high humidity. I had no problem doing the physical part but I saw more wildlife on Amazon.com as all we saw were a few birds and lizards. Everyone wanted to see crocodiles. Next time, zip lining through the trees at 75 feet above the rain forest floor sounds more inviting and was excellent as reported by other passengers.
One thing you really notice is how lucky we have it in the United States. Items we take for granted are out of reach for most of the people.
I have come to enjoy cruising and am already looking into booking my next cruise. I'm thinking Alaska will probably be next but Hawaii and Italy look inviting also.
The Island Princess was smaller than the Crown Princess since it was built specifically to travel through the Panama Canal. There were about 2,400 passengers compared to 3,400 passengers.
My brother is getting married next week (more in another entry) and he is going through the canal on his honeymoon and ending up in San Francisco. It will be his first cruise and while he wanted to know everything, my future sister-in-law didn't want to know anything.
|
|
I recently had another round of scheduled appointments with my cardiologist and primary care physician.
First up was my appointment with my cardiologist. I really haven't been feeling one hundred percent for the past three weeks. I've been feeling light, constant pressure in my head, I guess you could call it a light headache. I've also been experiencing some dizziness and have had some balance issues. I had dizziness and balance issues for a few weeks after a cruise that I went on last November and don't know if the issues are related. I haven't been playing much golf since it isn't too fun when you can't keep your balance and are playing like crap. I also wanted to concentrate on my workouts at the gym since I consider my workouts more important than playing golf.
I've been looking forward to the appointment with my cardiologist for a while now. My cardiologist is very approachable and I wanted to discuss some issues with him. I feel that I can discuss any issue with him and not get fed bullshit. I'll get his honest opinion and I respect his viewpoints. It helps getting somebody else's perspective on issues since I know I can get tunnel vision sometimes. We ended up exchanging ideas on a few different issues.
My cardiologist ended up ordering a ct scan of my head for which I've included two images from the study. He was able to get precertification from my insurance company and I had the scan within an hour of his order. This was a Friday and my appointment with my PCP was Monday. I don't mind getting scanned and besides, my deductible period is from April 1st through the end of March so this wasn't going to cost me a dime and I knew if my PCP was going to order a study, it wouldn't get done before the end of March and it would cost me a few bucks so why not get a freebie. I was happy to find out there was nothing obvious and I received a normal report although some would argue that I have nothing inside my head.
I then had my appointment with my PCP. They changed my routine with lab work this time around. For every prior appointment, they have ordered my labs and I've gotten them done beforehand. I had lab work ordered by my oncologist for chromogranin A serum levels for which the result was well within normal limits. Chromogranin A is used as a marker used to monitor patients who have neuroendocrine tumors. When I asked about labs ordered by my PCP, I was told none were on order. It wasn't a big deal but it sucks fasting for 12 hours and then having to do it again.
I showed my PCP my blood glucose levels for the past week and he ended up increasing the amount of Lantus (long acting insulin) and prescribing Novalog, which is short acting insulin that I will take before meals.
We also discussed my light headaches, dizziness and balance issues. He believes it may be an inner ear problem and ordered a brain MRI and referred me to a neurologist. I also started experiencing ringing in the ears which sucks but it isn't too hard to ignore. I say that in the short term and hope it is only a short term symptom.
Its been a very frustrating year and a half. I haven't particularly enjoyed dealing with a bunch of egomanical medical professionals who have no clue in how to treat people like people. It has been clearly obvious that they overestimate their own abilities and underestimate the patient. They have been clinically excellent and I love my results but I don't believe for one second that the ends justify the means. I know many are judged by their results but people should be treated like people. Many of the issues I've encountered could have been completely avoided if people acted professionally or treated me like they said they were going to. I will also say that its been a real pleasure dealing with 99% of the medical professionals. I know its not an easy job when dealing with people and I give them credit and respect for their efforts. They're efforts do make a difference.
In a previous entry, Opposite Approaches, I mentioned that I received a prescription for test strips when I asked for and specifically requested a script for a “Bayer Glucose Meter”. I don't know how much clearer I could have been, but I digress. I had also sent in my blood glucose readings with that message. It was the second week in a row I sent in my readings which I was instructed to do after my last consult. I had never received a comment back regarding my numbers and I sent a message in asking why I never received a comment back regarding those numbers and also asked for an explanation on why the Novalog wasn't prescribed two months earlier when my numbers were comparable. We had previously discussed the possibility of Novalog to help control my diabetes. I already knew the nurse that handled my communication dropped the ball regarding the scripts and I was basically asking why I never received a comment back on the blood glucose numbers. I already knew the answer, I knew there was an error in communication but I also know that I am ultimately responsible for making sure my inquiries are answered.
I sure did open a can of worms which is what I was hoping for. The nurse on the team called me on the phone since she sensed I had concerns based on my message she had triaged. I thought it was obvious since I used the words "red flags" in my message. She shared her opinion of how important the role of a primary care physician regarding patient care is, especially a patient with my conditions. She offered a possible solution that if I was not satisfied, that they could recommend another primary care physician. I shared my concern regarding the lack of communication two months before. While I appreciate the overall efforts of this particular nurse for the past year, the only thing she accomplished in the next few minutes was raise more concern on my part. She fed me every excuse in the book why my message two months before regarding my glucose readings went unanswered. She first took the position that it wasn't her who fielded the original message. I have no control who receives my communication. I am sending correspondence to my doctor and I have no control of who answers. I know inquiries are triaged by the staff . From this patients point of view, I have to trust the doctor and the staff. She then started giving me excuse after excuse regarding the miscommunication. While it was obvious that she was protecting her co-worker, the only statement she didn't make was that a mistake was made by the nurse who handled my inquiry. I was using this question as a measuring device to see if my trust level would rise with the team. I was hoping I would have heard, Yes Kevin, a mistake was made and we'll try to make sure this doesn't happen again. If I hear that, its end of story and no longer an issue. I know that I'm responsible and would never assign blame to a nurse who originally dropped the ball. I made a poor decision not to follow up when I didn't receive a comment back since I knew my numbers weren't good.
I actually have no issues with any medical opinions given by my primary care physician. I know its a team approach and I also have to trust the team which is where I'm having doubts. I know I'm getting his best effort and I can easily accept the outcome of our relationship. I've realized over the past year that I could have used them a little more when I've run into issues elsewhere. I want to be sure that I can trust them but my trust seems to be dwindling with each interaction with the team. The team has had trouble executing what I would call simple tasks and have acted in a way in what I would call inappropriate a couple of times.
While I appreciate the reference that the surgeon I am seeing is highly respected, they can't keep their mouths shut and leave it at that. They have to add derogatory comments to their opinion. While I could care less who they are taking about, the fact that they would talk out of school to an client regarding co-workers is a pet peeve of mine that I do not appreciate and consider unprofessional. I also don't appreciate fielding comments that I could perceive as too personal in nature that could only have been learned from reading my medical record. I value my privacy and while I have to give them the benefit of the doubt since I don't know for sure the reason behind the comment, it is still very disturbing.
Then we have errors that I believe should never have happened. Its really not the individual errors or bullshit comments that concern me, its the quantity of them.
I still have trouble believing what happened when I asked for a referral for the gastroenterologist at Hopkins. I was handed an order for an upper gi from the nurse and I immediately pointed out that this was not a referral. The nurse told me that it was just a printout from a different screen and that it was ok. I saw it was a loosing battle and asked for another referral two days later which I received. I know filling out paperwork for insurance purposes isn't the most desirable task but it is a necessary evil. I know it would have been “tough shit Kevin” when the insurance company denies the claim for a procedure that didn't have the proper referral and I'm stuck with an enormous medical bill. The other asinine part of this issue is that I was treated like a thief by the staff that takes care of the claims at the office. I got the runaround from the insurance company and nurse when I noticed that the original order for the upper gi had been submitted as a claim and paid for by my insurance company. She did not believe me that the procedure wasn't performed until she actually opened up the order on the system and read a comment in the order that said the procedure was incorrectly ordered and not performed. Once she read that, she changed her toon real quick and agreed to reverse the claim.
Then we have my recent CT Thorax study that was performed to follow up on an enlarged pretracheal node as a result of a study that was performed at Johns Hopkins. I first had to alert the staff that I needed certain labs ordered since protocol dictate those labs be done within the last 30 days since I will be receiving contrast material. Protocol also dictates that I receive those same labs two days after since I take a certain medication that is stopped because of the contrast. I don't mind assisting but it gets ridiculous that I have to remind them a second time to order labs so that I could restart my medication. A bonus is receiving a call from the staff giving me the results of the study. I'm told my kidneys are ok and that is it. No mention of the actual reason for the study which is the first line item mentioned on the radiologists report.
I guess the kicker is agreeing to come in an talk to my PCP regarding my issues. I received voice mail from a member of the staff asking me to call in to set up an appointment with my PCP. The message states to call in and ask for her specifically and that she would assist me in setting up an appointment. I called in and left a message for her since she was unavailable. I receive an electronic message back that I could have talked to anyone to set up an appointment and that I should call the main number to setup an appointment and that my PCP would like to see me within a month if possible. I guess I misunderstood her message because my mind reading capabilities aren't working at the moment. When you say call in and state that I should ask for you, thats what I do. I sent a message back to her thanking her for her efforts and that I'll call the main number.
I know our goals are the same but its getting to be ridiculous. I know from my career experience that relationships are sometimes volatile but I just don't know if this relationship is worth the effort. I realize that errors are made and that everyone is human. I also realize that its not an easy job for a staff that size to care for a large number of patients. I also realize that I'm not the only patient. I know I have to take an active part in my care. My original intention was to come in and have a face to face with my PCP and to ask for his help. All I could ask for is everyones best effort. I don't think that is happening and I don't think my expectations are unrealistic. I don't think health care should be this difficult. I really don't know if changing providers would solve the problem or just change the cast of characters. Its seems to me to be a pretty easy decision to make but I still want to take some time to weigh all the issues.
On a lighter note, I've become a big fan of the television show House. I think Hugh Laurie does an excellent job portraying his character. I just love the interactions between the characters.
I'm leaving today for my cruise through the Panama Canal. I'm probably not too bright for getting on a cruise ship when I'm having balance issues but what the heck.
I recently enjoyed an evening out with some good friends. It is what I would call our second annual dinner meeting in what I hope will turn out to be a long lasting tradition. My friend Don and his wife Jenny were in town and we met for dinner at a local restaurant. I met Don and Jenny via my blog. Don was diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma approximately the same time I was.
We keep in touch via email and share the occasional phone call but its always nice to see them in person and catch up on the happenings in each of our lives. Don and Jenny haven't seen me with a beard and didn't recognize me at first because of it.
We reminisced about our experiences and Don asked me a very intriguing question. He asked how I dealt with my conditions. This is where Don and I have opposite approaches. I purposely didn't answer since I respect his position on this issue.
Don, please stop reading here.
I'm an information junkie, pure and simple. The more information I have regarding my condition, the easier it is for me understand what is happening to me or what could happen to me down the road . I don't like surprises and not being aware of what could happen regarding my conditions is an issue that I find unacceptable. I also like to make informed decisions so I research and any issue I don't understand, I will ask my provider to evaluate for me.
When I'm going to have a procedure, I research, research, research. I like to know the possible complications and I calculate the odds of each type of complication by reading published papers on the procedure and then doing the math. If my memory serves me correctly, I calculated a 2.2% chance of having a pseudocyst or a collection of fluid after my distal pancreatectomy.
I research my conditions just as thoroughly. For my renal cell carcinoma, I know the percentages regarding recurrence or metastasis for someone with my staging. I know the most likely time frames for those events and what areas of the body are most common places for metastasis. I also know that the surveillance strategies for patients with my staging usually ends in 5 years. Thats another issue in itself but it has to do with the high percentage of no recurrence or no metastases and resources that would be used in providing surveillance over the course of a lifetime for a staging that has only a 5 percent chance of returning. By using the Internet, its not to hard to find people with my staging who have experienced recurrence or metastases as many as 15+ years after initial treatment. One just has to put it in proper perspective, knowing about 15 patients in that 5% bracket, out of tens of thousands with the same staging is a statistical probability. Yeah, I know it sucks being in that 5% bracket and I hope I don't end up joining them but I'm not paralyzed by the fact that it is a possibility.
Information regarding islet cell is allot harder to come by. It is a rarer condition and there are not many studies on the subject. I posted a comment on the Pancreas Blog at Johns Hopkins in response to an article published by my surgeon. In his response, he used the word cure as a descriptor for my case. I believe the word cure is used too loosely when it relates to cancer and surgical outcomes. The word cure is very misleading when taken out of context. I believe the word curative would be more appropriate term. Most patients will hear the word cure and think they are at no further risk of disease. While it may be true in some cases, I know it isn't true regarding my islet cell tumor. I would consider my surgery curative in the sense that my tumor was resected and I had the best possible result. Most islet cell tumors that are non-functional like mine are not diagnosed until they become large and cause symptoms by pressing against other organs in the abdomen. Non-functional islet cell tumors commonly present with metastases to the liver and the 5 year survival rate for non-functional islet cell tumors is approximately 50%. What is considered a prognostic factor is tumor size. That magic number seems to be 4 cm. While there is no clear cut rule, bad things usually happen when the tumor exceeds 4 cm in size and in most cases, patients are still asymptomatic at that point. This is where my case is not considered a normal presentation since my tumor was an incidental finding, only 9 mm and I have no evidence of metastases. I also know there is a possibility of recurrence or metastases. From a study published from researchers at Massachusetts General, there were 3 patients who had benign islet cell tumors (including non-functional) resected that where smaller than 2 cm that experienced a recurrence or metastases. The cohort was extremely small and basically gives me the conclusion that even a small benign islet cell tumor is unpredictable. This study makes the use of the word cure misleading and probably inappropriate when taken out of context.
While I'm not a statistic, I'd say that I'm in the best position possible for the conditions that I have. I'm fortunate to be in the position that I am but this position has its good and bad points. A good point is that I'm in good shape. Being in good shape could also be perceived as having its bad points. One perception as driven home by books on the subject as well as from support groups is that when one is diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma, one should seek an oncologist who is experienced and considered an expert in treating renal cell carcinoma. The reality of the situation is that I'm in good shape and my staging doesn't warrant a consult from an expert.
Some patients stick their heads in the ground and don't want to know anything. Some would be happy just knowing the percentages as given to them by their providers. I like to know as much as I can and know the possibilities of my condition. Thats how I deal and can live with my conditions. I'm not in denial and I accept the fact that I'm human and have the maladies that I have and I choose to keep on living. This viewpoint was driven home to me by my first urologist. I'll play the cards I'm dealt and that is all I can do. I believe I've given myself the best opportunity to be in the best position I could be in. I've chosen surgeons that have given me the best opportunity for a positive outcome and I've been fortunate that I seem to be experiencing the best possible outcome for each procedure.
In a previous entry, I stated that I seem to be a magnet for shit happening. I had a good laugh today. I had requested two prescriptions from my PCP. One was for my insulin and the other was for a Blood Glucose Monitoring System. I recently lost one of my monitoring systems while I was traveling and wanted to replace it. The manufacturer I happen to use has a program that will let me replace the unit free of cost if I present a manufacturers coupon, which I have, along with a prescription for the unit. I asked for those prescriptions. I received them today, one for for insulin and the other was for test strips for that particular monitoring system. Am I missing something here or is this payback for some misdeed I've committed in the past? The only good thing is that I'm not taking it too seriously anymore. I went to Walmart and purchased a system.
Health Care - Perception or Reality, Either way Shit Happens
Pardon my french, but Shit Happens seems to be an appropriate title for this entry into my blog. I believe it is an appropriate metaphor for most of the issues I've encountered over the past year. While many would like to believe the world of health care mirrors television shows like Marcus Welby, the reality is much different in this patients point of view. You can call this a retrospective view of my experiences.
I don't know how to really phrase it but I would have to say that my journey into the world of health care is nothing short of a rude awakening.
I'm going to keep it simple and break it down into a few categories.
How to pick a Provider.
In my case, my conditions that have needed intervention have been clear cut and straightforward. I didn't have to deal with symptoms that could indicate a variety of medical conditions.
I myself have gone through a transformation when it comes to how I deal with my own health. I've gone from having blind trust in my providers to the complete opposite, trust no one until they earn it. I research as much as I can to lessen the odds of making an uninformed choice.
I now view my relationships with my providers as partnerships. I'm the top dog and will make my own decisions and I'll do whatever I believe is necessary to be able to make an informed decision. I have to live with the result which is why I'm the top dog and believe I have to take that type of responsibility. I'll research my condition to the best of my ability and ask questions that I believe need to be evaluated in order to make that informed decision.
I've never really had a serious illness and when I did have an issue that needed intervention, I always had my mother as a guide. She is an operating room nurse and is way better qualified (if there is such a thing) to evaluate a provider because she sees them in action. She knew who was good and I know her choices were always based on clinical ability.
I'm now an adult and have to make my own decisions.
I have no clue on how to gauge a providers skills. I research their education, evaluate the reputations of institutions where they may have worked and most importantly the experience they have with my condition and their results in treating that condition. By using the internet, it isn't too difficult too follow their careers and figure out what organizations they are involved in, what areas of interests they have in regards to papers they may have had published and the relationships, if any, of the staff and how they may have been recruited to be on that particular staff. It also isn't too difficult to figure out what companies back their research with grants. If I have the opportunity to ask another health professional an opinion on a provider, I'll ask and evaluate the statements based on what was said and what was not said. I really don't take input from other patients since I believe my model for a provider is different from other patients but I do recognize that if many patients are satisfied with the results from being treated by a particular provider, then I'm interested in researching that provider. From there, its all interaction, instinct and then trust. Its all about lessening the odds of making a bad decision. Even if you make a good decision, as I have learned, you can still end up in a bad relationship and thats just the way it is because shit happens.
Another issue I evaluate is bedside manner. I look at bedside manner as the ability to communicate and exchange information so that I have the information I need to make an informed decision and/or am up to date on my medical status. Sure, its nice to exchange pleasantries with your provider and we all want to have the warm fuzzies but for me, it comes down to information exchange.
Then we have the intangibles. My provider can't do everything by themselves and they have to have an infrastructure in place to support them. That includes staff and a technology platform to handle and organize all the data on each patient and the ability recall that data quickly to assist in treatment as well as having the ability to offer a vehicle to communicate with patients is a manner consistent with the world we live in today, most namely the internet and electronic communication. They also need the ability to use that technology in a way that the pros outweigh the cons.
How do I rate the partnership?
There is only one way to rate the partnership and that is the bottom line. If I achieve the best possible outcome, I'm satisfied but that doesn't necessarily mean I'm going to continue that partnership.
There really is nothing common about "common sense". Everyone has their own sense of what is correct and what isn't. The same goes for "common decency" but there should be less of a gap in each persons definition of common decency since after all, we all should treat each other the way we would want to be treated but it doesn't always work that way.
I always take the time to reflect on or analyze the situations I've experienced for the sole purpose of learning on how to improve any deficiency if I have to go through that situation a second time. I'm a firm believer that everyone continues to learn not matter how much experience they have. I know I'm not perfect and don't like to make the same error twice. I've learned plenty over the past year and my views have changed accordingly. Am I correct? I don't know.
Health Insurance
Lets face it, your health insurance basically determines what providers you have access to. I don't kid myself and no matter how you look at it, it is still a business. In its simplest form, you can bet there are cost/benefit analysis for every office consult or type of diagnostic test and standards are based on the results of that research. Its driven by cost and what benefits the majority rather than the minority.
I happen to belong to Geisinger HMO. I think they do an above average job in providing the environment and resources to give me the best care available. There may have been times that I didn't think that but in retrospect, they do a great job and I am totally satisfied with my bottom line and the quality of providers I can choose from.
Monday Morning Quarterback
I've never met a group of people with more confidence in their own abilities than doctors. I'd say that is a definite prerequisite for the job, especially if they are a surgeon. I know I want to be treated by someone who has plenty of confidence in their own ability. I know I don't want to hear "I think I can do it". This is where a gray area comes into play. What some people will interpret as confidence, others will interpret as ego or arrogance. Either way, there is plenty of posturing and political correctness going on. One has to be able to interpret and evaluate a statement and be able to read between the lines. I know I don't take any statement for granted. One of my providers took all my studies that were on CD and told me he was sending them down to the radiology department to be read. I thought to myself, bull, if they needed to do that, I'm in the wrong place. I knew it was a jedi mind trick and I checked with radiology for the reports and there were none which meant they wern't sent down to be read. I usually do'n't miss a trick. I also realize that patients are often underestimated in their ability to comprehend their situation. I've been able to use that to my advantage as I've been able to get information or get questions answered because of it. One of my golfing buddies was a hospital administrator. This particular hospital started asking patients to rate their satisfaction with their doctors. The comment made by most of the doctors when told of this satisfaction survey was that they believe the patients should just be satisfied they agreed to see them. Is this true? I'm sure there is some truth to it but I would hope it isn't the norm.
I know I'm one arrogant son of a bitch with tons of confidence when it comes to my career in information technology. There is also another thing I know about myself, my shit stinks when I make a mistake and I learn from it and move on. The one caveat between information technology and medicine is that in medicine, people are involved and when peoples feelings are involved, especially when they are dealing with an illness such as cancer, shit happens.
It's only my own observation on my own experiences but I learned real quickly that doctors won't or don't acknowledge mistakes. One thing for sure is that its bad for the ego to admit an error. They are working on peoples bodies and the stakes are high. I don't even know if mistake is the correct word but I learned real quickly when my first urologist told me that he didn't care if I went back to Pennsylvania or not. I know he thought I challenged his credentials when I had asked a question. When I went back and explained to him that I wasn't challenging his credentials and to ask him exactly what he meant, he stated that what he meant was that he didn't mind if I went for a second opinion. I thought wow, great rationalization on your part but your explanation didn't do bupkis for me. I did what I had to do to get answers about my condition and sought treatment elsewhere. There have been other situations I've experienced or read about and you'll either get a rationalization, get fed generalizations or you'll end up getting an explanation short or an acknowledgment of an error because there is one thing probably drilled into physicians by legal counsel and that is to never admit to a mistake or wrongdoing since it may be used in a malpractice suit.
I look at my own experiences in a different light now than I did when they happened to me. You can call it learning from my own experiences or my own rationalization of events so that I can live with it, but one thing is for sure, I'm thrilled with my bottom line. I haven't run into a provider yet that has had bad clinical skills as defined by my ability to be satisfied with the outcome of such relationship.
I value my partnership with Dr. Rukstalis. I didn't pick his name out of a hat when I was looking for a surgeon to treat my kidney cancer. I looked at the institutions in my HMO that I had access to and could most likely provide me with a favorable outcome, namely Geisinger and Johns Hopkins. I then looked at the providers available to me. Even though my relationship with my first urologist wasn't the best, I still valued his clinical skills because I had done the research and when he mentioned my possible treatment options, he mentioned cryoablation and nephrectomy. You better believe I realized that partial nephrectomy was left out for a reason. I did my research on cryoablation and realized all the research and sucess Dr. Rukstalis had put into making cryoablation a viable option for kidney cancer patients. You better believe I wanted the best surgeon available to handle my case and when I called to make an appointment at Geisinger, I was given two choices and I chose Dr. Rukstalis. Our relationship from my point of view hasn't always been smooth but I'm thrilled that I have two functioning kidneys and my prognosis is good. I've always looked at issues in a "big picture" type manner. I see Dr. Rukstalis as a doctor, surgeon, teacher, researcher, manager since he is head of urology. I can only imagine how difficult his time management is. I have plenty of admiration and respect for him and I think I surprised him at our last consult when I gave him a hug, it was just my way of saying Thank You. I can't help but like the guy also, I very much enjoy our conversations. He gave me all the time I needed during my first two consults and I can't tell you what that meant to me. He answered all my questions and corrected some mistakes I made in my research of cryoablation. I know my consults after the surgery should last 10 minutes but the reality of the situation from my point of view is that I had questions that I needed answers too for closures sake and the time wasn't available for whatever reason. Issues and frustration had built up over a period of time and I needed resolution. To his credit, Dr. Rukstalis is the only person that I have communicated with that has given the time and consideration to the issues that I had. I don't need to be in agreement on the issues but all I needed to put those issues behind me was the consideration.
I've also learned from my experience with the urologist who took care of my kidney stones. I'll never put myself in that position again. I communicated my concerns and wishes during my history and physical appointment which included that I didn't want to be treated by a certain doctor. When I asked who would be included in my care, which is within my patient rights, I was told that information wasn't available. I relayed exactly who I didn't want to be treated by and felt that when the information of who was assigned to my case, should have be revealed to me when it became available. When that doctor showed up minutes before the procedure was to start, I was agitated to say the least. The anesthesiologist saw I was agitated and asked why and I was candid and gave the reason why I was agitated. I still only had minutes to decide what I should do. I know one option would have been to withdraw my consent but I decided to go through with the procedure because I had no doubts regarding either doctors clinical skills. In retrospect, I didn't anticipate the emotions I went through after the procedure. From my point of view, I trusted the doctor and my trust was betrayed and I experienced the emotions of betrayal and violation. When my emotions subsided, I concluded that shit happens and I couldn't imagine a scenario where anything was intentional. The one issue I had remaining was bedside manner. It was obvious to me that the doctor whom I didn't want to be treated by found out when I was under anesthesia what my wishes were. I was never consulted after the procedure and I find that totally unacceptable. I shouldn't have had to consider calling the office the next day or waiting for my next appointment with Dr. Rukstalis to ask for the outcome. I was satisfied with the clinical outcome and was able to put this issue behind me when I spoke with Dr. Rukstalis.
Some issues I will never understand. I discussed this issue with Dr. Rukstalis and I told him of my experiences of professionals at Geisinger who tell me that he is a good doctor but that he treats his nurses badly. I was creative when we discussed this and I told him that having him as my doctor was like having a Scarlet R on my chest. All I know is that when I walk into the Urology department, all the staff treats me with the dignity and respect that I think every patient deserves. He should be commended for providing such an atmosphere. I've experienced the opposite and believe me, the last issue a cancer patient wants to deal with is a person who is rude and obnoxious which unfortunately, I've experienced.
I'm not naive and know in all organizations, people will gossip. It just amazes me each time people will open their mouths to clients regarding matters that should not be discussed with clients or in my case, the patient. I find that type of behavior unprofessional and it just pisses me off to no end. Since my discussion with Dr. Rukstalis, I've changed my view on how I'll deal with it. Instead of keeping quiet, I'll pull them aside and explain to them that its unfair to both patients and Dr. Rukstalis and its definitely, unacceptable professional behavior.
I specifically mentioned my experience with the general surgeon to Dr. Rukstalis. You only get one chance at a first impression and hearing both the nurses and surgeons comments regarding Dr. Rukstalis did nothing in the way of letting me trust this doctor for anything other than an opinion. It also impeded my desire and ability to communicate effectively with him. I don't think it was acceptable behavior just like I didn't think it was appropriate for me to find out via a scheduler that he had scheduled me for a splenectomy. I believe proper protocol would have been for him to inform me of the option before scheduling it. I just didn't have the level of trust I needed to pick up the phone to call him and say WTF is going on here. I also didn't particularly like the lack of information exchange when I asked about tumor size or location. I actually love my outcome with this doctor because he worked hard to get me a resolution on my spleen and it led to the incidental finding on my pancreas. The only thing I regret or am disappointed in is the reason why I dismissed him. I would have loved to have the opportunity to exhaust all possibilities and discuss all issues with him regarding my pancreatic tumor before I made the decision to seek treatment at Johns Hopkins.
I was also very satisfied with the outcome of the EUS with FNA by the doctor at Geisinger. My only issue was bedside manner. The exchange of information after the procedure was lacking from my point of view. I was given the opinion that the results from the FNA on my spleen didn't warrant any further intervention. I was also shown a picture of my pancreas and was given the opinion that it was an hemangioma and that the doctor was seeking a second opinion. I have no clue on why I was told this but my memory of the consult matches perfectly with my advocate and friend Bruce who happens to be well versed in neuroendocrine tumors since he had one resected himself. I also wasn't told that an FNA was performed on the pancreatic lesion. I was completely surprised when I received the letter from the doctor who stated that I had a neuroendocrine tumor, as we discussed, especially since we didn't discuss it. I really didn't care about the "as we discussed" issue since it really didn't matter to me because I was notified in a timely manner by the letter. However, this doctor contacted me and asked if I could provide any follow up information to my case. I thought great, a doctor who really cares and that maybe I could ask him some questions as well and maybe benefit from his experience. It quickly turned into each of us sharing our memories of the procedure. The one statement that poured salt into the wound was his statement that he doesn't treat his patients that way. I love the fact that I benefited from his expertise and years of experience but I can't control what he remembers when I know what was said. I know one possibility of my current medical status is that maybe I might need to have the pseudocyst drained and one option is via EUS. While I would want someone of his experience and skill level performing such a procedure, the trust I need for him to perform the procedure just isn't there because of the lack of communication after the first procedure. As it stands now, I just can't make that leap of faith.
This brings me to my experience at Johns Hopkins and with Dr. Makary. I thought going thought the clinic was great and who wouldn't want a consult with doctors with the experience they have in dealing with my condition. I spoke ad nausea m with Bruce about this issue as I tend to see issues a little differently than others. I knew I was shopping for a surgeon and while I was getting the expertise provided by a place like Johns Hopkins, the care wasn't going to have the same pros and cons compared to getting evaluated and treated at an institution like Geisinger. I believe I've been in enough hospitals as a patient and as a visitor to know what is considered good care and I would consider both to be above average. When you go to Johns Hopkins for my condition, you are going for the expertise of the surgeon and an issue such as surveillance, while important, is not really an issue that carries much weight for my particular case. I've been told by my providers that the surgeon who performed the procedure should have looked at and evaluated any post-surgical complication. I believe that is a perception and not a reality for this particular application. Lets call it what it is, I had one of the best perform my surgery, that's what he does, he helps people with pancreatic tumors. Dr. Makary liked to use the analogy that I hit a home run. I see it as I was the baseball manager, I used the ultimate pinch hitter and they hit a grand slam and cleared the bases, now its time for the next batter to come to the plate for me.
I thought everything went like clockwork as pertaining to the doctors I worked with while I was in Baltimore. The gastroenterologist who tattooed my lesion was top notch as was his bedside manner. He communicated the details perfectly. I love Dr. Makary because I love my outcome. Who wouldn't want to be treated by a surgeon of his caliber and reputation. He was there waiting with me before I went into surgery, he was pleasant when he visited my room and most of all, he gave me all the time I needed and answered all the questions I needed for closure when I had a consult a month after my surgery.
However, and there always seems to be an however whenever I'm involved and that is shit happens. I was told during my consult by Dr. Makary that he likes to perform the surgery within two days of a patient getting the tumor tattooed since the dye will only last about 5 days. I waited a few days after I received the EUS appointment and when I never heard from Dr. Makary's office, I sent him an email stating that I had received the appointment for the endoscopy procedure and that I wanted to make sure we were on the same page regarding a surgery date. He forwarded my email to his senior assistant.
I received an email from his senior assistant stating that they hadn't been notified of my endoscopy appointment and that they would look into it. I thought cool, ok, we are back on track and on the same page. We played phone tag but I finally talked to the assistant on the phone on 8/29/2008. The assistant informed me that I was scheduled for surgery on September 5, 2008 at 7:30 am, the day after the endoscopy procedure, providing the tattooing procedure was successful. What happened next would definitely be called shit happens.
I was never told when and where to report as well as no pre-surgery protocols for diet and I never received any correspondence in the mail regarding the surgery. After I was verbally given the date and the assistant started to say good bye, I started to ask questions. I have a medical history which includes a heart attack and while it was included in the medical history I provided for the Multidisciplinary Clinic, the only people who questioned me where the nurses at the Endoscopy Suite when they informed me of my appointment. I was told they required the clinic notes from my last cardiologists visit to clear me for the procedure. My experiences at Geisinger have given me the experience to know that I need more than clinic notes to be cleared for surgery. I asked what documents I needed to provide to clear myself for surgery and I was told that I should fax the notes from my cardiac cathetherrization procedure and last clinic notes to the office. I also asked about being interviewed by the anesthesia department before the surgery and was given the impression that I was going to receive an appointment. It was a holiday weekend with Monday being a holiday and the assistant always contacted me in the evening. On Tuesday, I did my thing and got all my medical records together which included me getting the results of my stress test which had cleared me for my cryoablation surgery some 6 months earlier. I then faxed everything into the office. I didn't hear from the office and started to call Dr. Makary's office on Wednesday, September 3. I must have called 7 times but always received the answering machine. I left a message stating that I didn't know where and when to report for the surgery. I included my cell phone as a contact number since I was traveling to Baltimore that day. I never heard back from Dr. Makary's office. I knew I could send an email to Dr. Makary himself but I was still trying to deal with his office. I ended up sending an email to an operating room nurse who I worked with when I went through the clinic. I ended up getting the details of when and where to report from her.
After I went through the tattooing procedure, the nurses gave me a few crackers to eat and asked if I was allowed to eat any solid food. I told them I wasn't given any pre-surgery protocols to follow and that I was just about to go out and eat a big meal because I was hungry from not eating in preparation for the tattooing. They called Dr. Makary's office and actually got through and I ended up talking to a person. The young man I spoke with told me that the senior assistant was out sick. I was given the correct pre-surgery protocols to follow regarding diet. I then asked if they received the fax of my medical records. I was told they were still sitting in the fax machine.
Needless to say I don't think this chain of events should ever have occurred. I'm sympathetic to a persons illness but when they send out an email with a signature that states they are the senior assistant, it is safe to conclude there are other people available to take care of business should the need arise. This is a perfect example of why patients shouldn't communicate via email with their doctors offices. It's a different issue if you are directly emailing the doctor asking questions. I'm a computer geek and I know there is a email function called vacation that easily could have been set to automatically reply to anybody who sent an email to that account. If a person doesn't know how to properly use an asset, they shouldn't be using it. That reply could have included directions on who to contact since the assistant was out sick. It also didn't help that nobody returned a voice mail to the office.
When I was recovering after the surgery and Dr. Makary visited my room, I told him that I had some miscommunication with his office. I purposely never went into details. He responded that his senior office assistant was a very good asset and that the assistant had been ill. Personally, if someone told me one they had a miscommunication with one of my staff, I would want to know the details so that I could make the proper assessment and corrections if any were needed so that it could be avoided in the future.
This was a definite case of shit happens but its also a case of how a crisis brings out the best in people. It also demonstrates that a patient has to be informed and take some responsibility for their own care. I prefer to look at this situation in a positive light. The staff at Geisinger and Hopkins more than made up for any deficiency but I would have preferred that it be a drama free situation but the end result is what matters. I had all the information I needed when I met with the anesthesiologist the morning of my surgery and I was cleared.
I should have learned my lesson and contacted Dr. Makary personally but I contacted his senior assistant when I had an upcoming MRI. I was ivory soap sure (99 44/100%) that the clips they used during my surgery were MRI safe. My request to verify that the clips were MRI safe went unanswered when I contacted his senior assistant.
One doctor I just loved was the doctor who performed my colonoscopy. It was an informational orgasm. I didn't have to ask one question regarding the procedure or his qualifications. He answered any question I might have had during his explanation of the procedure. How ironic he mentions that colonoscopies are not perfect and less than two weeks later a report comes out stating the exact same thing and guess who is on Fox News giving his opinion, none other than Dr. Makary. I received the status of the procedure immediately after, received follow up communications electronically and via mail. The only negative aspect of my experience was the Scarlett R on my chest. One nurse couldn't keep her mouth shut when reviewing my medical history before the procedure and felt obliged to give me her opinions regarding my urologist.
I seem to be a magnet for these types of situations. I know everyone has a bad day and that everyone makes the occasional error. I don't think for a second that these kind of issues are the norm and that they are the exception. I even realize that maybe I could do a better job.
I think I've experienced my share of shit happens. I'm amazed that I have a referral on file with my insurance company for a pediatrician. I have a fair assessment of the assets and their abilities at my disposal as well as a good idea in what type of environment they are operating in. Long story short, I asked for referral to the gastroenterologist at Hopkins. I was handed an order for an upper GI by the staff. I knew it was an order but saw that it was just one of those days in the trenches. I waited two days and asked for another referral and received it. That original order was processed and that claim was paid for by the insurance company. It took plenty of effort to clear that up and I was treated like I was trying to steal services when I finally got a hold of the correct person to reverse the claim. It was just an example of shit happens.
Then there are issues that are totally gray area and who knows who is responsible. For example, I was only informed of the mass on my spleen because I asked for and received my medical records and read the radiologists report myself. Who is responsible to tell me of that issue? Where would I be 10 years down the road if I hadn't become a believer that I have to take responsibility of my own care?
I've only been under the care of my PCP for a little over a year. I've spent a total of less than an hour with him. I didn't have to trust or bond with him immediately like I had to with a surgeon. I recently had a finding of a sub centimeter pretracheal node from a CT Scan at Johns Hopkins. While I researched it, I have no clue what it actually means and I'm not about to start diagnosing myself now. I made that mistake when I was diagnosed originally with kidney cancer and I wasn't going down that path again. I research my conditions so that I can assist when necessary and to make informed decisions regarding my care, nothing else. He ordered a CT of my Thorax as a follow up. I'm active in my own health care and after the ct was ordered, I know I need labs to be done in order to be allowed to have the ct scan. I knew that my team might not know this since it is not an issue they deal with regularly like say a surgeons staff would. They didn't order the labs I required and I alerted them to that issue and the labs were then ordered.
I know the procedures at Geisinger regarding requesting my medical records and I requested that study on CD which includes the radiologists report but that report can't be released to me until a certain amount of time has passed. As it turns out, I ended up with the report before I was contacted by my PCP's office. The study was done as follow up for the pretracheal node but when I was contacted by my PCP's staff on the phone, all I was told was that my kidneys were fine which was nice to hear but I see Dr. Rukstalis for opinions on that issue. There was no mention of the pretracheal node issue and no mention of the pseudocyst (which is understandable since protocol would require being told in person) but I wasn't concerned since I already had the report and I knew I had an office appointment with my PCP in a few days. I just considered it amazing that I wasn't told about the status of my pretracheal nodes, which was the purpose of this study.
This brings me to my PCP. When we discussed the pseudocyst, he was right on top of the issue and explained what type of intervention might be required. I told him I had already had the report and relayed the result of my communication with Dr. Makary. He had no issues with me having the report before I saw him. The bottom line is I know for sure that I am receiving excellent care and I have all the trust I need in him and his clinical abilities to follow his opinions.
I have the ability to adapt and I'm not green anymore as I consider myself a somewhat experienced now. I still have gray areas but I value the experience of a partner who will take the time to explain a situation from a view I might not have considered.
I love my bottom line. I love the quality of care afforded to me at Geisinger even with the anomalies. I may be naive but I'll never give up hope. I can honestly say that I hold no ill will towards anyone, life is too short. I can bury the hatchet with anyone and move on. This is real life and when feelings and egos are involved, shit happens. I know everyone who I have encountered is doing their best to resolve any health issue I have. I know one thing is for sure, I feel the best I have both mentally and physically in the past year and I make no apologies for what I had to do to feel that way.
The only issue on my agenda now is to put some hard work back into my golf game to get back to a single digit index.
Shit happens...................
I've seen my fair share of specialists already but this is the first time my medical history is being evaluated by an oncologist. I was referred to the oncologist by my primary care physician because of my islet cell tumor and post distal pancreatectomy operative changes, namely the pseudocyst.
I've only met one oncologist and that was when I went through genetic counseling at the Cancer Institute at Geisinger. I instantly liked him and could easily see why his peers voted him one of the Best Doctors in America for 2007-2008. I also appreciated the fact that he went beyond the reason for our consult and gave me direction regarding my pretracheal node issue.
The only other exposure I've had to oncologists are from the cancer forums on the web and from reading the blog of a retired oncologist. I take input from those sources with a grain of salt. However, I did make some observations like oncology has to be the toughest or one of the toughest disciplines in medicine. These doctors are dealing with the one emotion that all patients have when they walk in the door and that is hope. It can't be a pleasant thing to tell a patient to get their affairs in order after treating them and sharing that patients hope for a good outcome. I know each case is different and what works for one patient might not work for another. This discipline must have a high burnout rate as I can only imagine the long-term ramifications of continually having to take hope away from people and no matter how much one tries, not everyone can detach themselves from having patient empathy.
I've been called a difficult patient (not those exact words, but I digress) and I wear that moniker with a badge of honor. I research everything for the sole purpose of having the ability to ask questions for issues that I don't understand and to make an informed decision. I know I'm aggressive and rattle a few feathers since I don't follow any advice blindly like I have in the past, I have to have any issue explained to me in a way that I understand so that I can have the ability to make an informed choice . I make no apologies for it whatsoever. I want to make an informed decision so I can live with myself after the fact just in case I get a bad outcome.
I've done plenty of research on neuroendocrine tumors. I've read published papers, I've read books, I've talked to other islet cell patients, I'm a member of an islet cell group which includes doctors considered experts in the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors and I've watched countless hours of videos from conferences dedicated to neuroendocrine tumors. I've been most impressed with one leading expert who gives so much of his time and energy to help patients by answering any and all questions on one of the internet forums.
I educate myself to the best of my ability so I can make an informed decision but there is one thing I know I can never do, and that is to apply that information to my own case. There is only one person who can evaluate and treat and that is the doctor.
You only get once chance at a first impression and I was instantly excited at the possibility of working with this doctor. The doctor spent plenty of time with me getting my medical history and he was spot on with all his statements regarding any issue we discussed. I'm aware of the NCCN Guidelines in Oncology for treating Neuroendocrine tumors and this doctor made all the sense in the world to me when he stated each case is different which means each case can have a unique approach. I know my islet cell tumor is a rare finding and even rarer that it was found so early. There aren't many studies out there to use as a guideline. My friend and next door neighbor sees a different oncologist at the same facility regarding his neuroendocrine tumor. I don't know the exact specifics of his case but I know his tumor was larger than mine, was in the head of his pancreas and he had a whipple procedure to resect the tumor. He gets labs and scanned every 6 months but I know that probably isn't appropriate in my case. I have a very good comfort level with this doctor and I have an another appointment with him scheduled for six months. He is going to consult with a surgeon regarding my pseudocyst and from what research I did, as long as I remain asymptomatic, a CT Scan in six months is an appropriate course of action for surveillance. We spoke briefly regarding serum markers and I mentioned an additional marker that I had read about that could be used for surveillance. I believe I got the point across that I'm not trying to be a doctor and am just assisting in my own care and that any information I bring to the table is to be evaluated by him. He asked that I followup with the name of the marker since I could not remember the name and I did via MyGeisinger with references to that information. We ended the consult with him telling me that he is going to review all my information, get an opinion from one of the surgeons regarding my pseudocyst and that he will get back to me when he finishes his evaluation.
I know that I have two low grade tumors and I know my stage and grade for my renal cell carcinoma makes Dr. Rukstalis the person to follow me for that issue. I'm very happy to be in that position since it means I'm in pretty good shape on that front since I haven't been staged or graded high enough to warrant being treated by an oncologist.
Now I'll just wait for the evaluation from this doctor.
On December 19th, I had my 9 month post surgery consult with Dr. Rukstalis. The weather forecast was awful with snow expected to start overnight with accumulation from anywhere from 6-10 inches. I was going to postpone the appointment but said what the heck and went out to Danville the night before and stayed at the Pine Barn Inn.
I'd have to say this was one of my most productive consults. I've had many issues that I've wanted to discuss with him and there never seemed to be a good time or enough time to discuss them.
One of the issues I had and what I've always wondered about were my post surgical complications, most notably the atelectisis. I just wanted an explanation. I was feeling pretty good after my surgery and I was up and walking. I pulled a stupid patient trick when I found a spirometer on my bed after returning from a walk. Nobody showed me how to use it like they did later with the flutterer but the damn directions are imprinted on it and macho me just blew as hard as I could and aggravated my right side so I didn't use it anymore. Then my blood pressure dropped to something like 90/50 after getting a dose of Lopressor 5mg and a nurse told me to stay in bed. The nurse was a little creative with her instructions which included a blurb that she didn't want me to fall because she didn't want to fill out the paperwork if I fell. If my memory serves me right, I stayed in bed from late morning to late afternoon and that’s when the complications started. I'd say the atelectisis was the most painful experience through both surgeries and recoveries. I just wanted to ask Dr. Rukstalis about this and he explained why I received the medication and included an explanation on why I could have developed the atelectisis. All the research I did on recovery stated that a patient should be up and walking as much as possible after surgery and I thought my odds for developing the complications were increased when I stayed in bed and didn't use the spirometer but I really didn't care about the reason why, I just wanted to hear Dr. Rukstalis explain it to me. I was thrilled with Dr. S and Dr. K who handled my case and I knew I received excellent care and I left the hospital in pretty good shape. I still felt symptoms from the atelectisis for a good month but they eventually disappeared.
We exchanged our different views on all the issues that I brought to the table. We finished our conversation via an exchange of a few emails. I ended up with what I wanted and that was resolution. I know this is the best I've felt in a long time. I appreciate that fact that Dr. Rukstalis took the time to deal with me.
I've been scanned plenty of times between our appointments to know that I'm in pretty good shape and Dr. Rukstalis pulled my MRI up on the computer and explained everything. I wanted to know about the cyst on my left kidney and he went over that without me asking. He said I was doing well and thought I could go another year without seeing him but he decided that my appointment should be in 9 months. I like going down to Danville and getting everything done in a day but I don't experience anxiety when I have the MRI and it doesn't make a difference to me if I have to wait a day or two weeks for the results. I requested that any lab work if needed be done at Scenery Park and that the MRI be done at Grays Woods. It's just a matter of convenience for me as both of those Geisinger offices are less than 15 minutes from my house. I would just prefer just to go to Danville for my consult with him for the results.
Dr. Rukstalis was also kind enough to give me his opinion on my post surgical changes regarding my distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy.
When I left urology the snow had already started to accumulate. I didn’t have anywhere to go so I just people watched for a few hours and stayed at the Pine Barn Inn another night and left early the next morning. The roads were clear and it was no problem getting home.
In an era where healthcare reform is such a hot issue, one fact as demonstrated in Massachusetts, is the shortage of primary care physcians. It was probably the best move I've made in the past year when I switched to my current primary care physician. Over the period of the last year, he has gained my trust. I just seem to understand everything that he recommends and that it makes total sense to me.
I had my regularly scheduled appointment yesterday. It was oh so sweet not going to see a specialist but that ends on Friday as I have an MRI scheduled and an appointment with Dr. Rukstalis, my urologist for a consult regarding my renal cell carcinoma. I've actually been looking forward to this one because its going to be a 5 minute consult at most. The only item that will prevent me from going to this appointment is that I have to verify that the surgical clips used during my distal pancreatectomy with spleenectomy are made of titanium. Titanium is MRI safe while surgical clips made of ferrous/metal material will act like projectiles/shrapnel when introduced into an MRI. I'm 99% sure my clips are titanium but there is no way I'm going near an MRI until I'm 100% sure.
We went over my lab results and a few labs that stood out were my hemoglobin A1C, which was 11.1, and my fasting glucose which was very high. I knew my A1C would be high because of the surgery and it did take a while to get my blood sugar under control. I've also been out of my regular routine lately so I haven't been the best at watching my diet. We looked at my previous weeks glucose numbers and upped my insulin a few more units. We discussed the possible use of short acting insulin to help control my diabetes. I'll get back into my routine and I know my numbers will get better. I didn't go through all this to shoot myself in the foot years down the road since uncontrolled diabetes can destroy my heart and kidneys.
We then turned our attention to the results of my chest CT Scan. He let me know that there was no lymphadenopathy which basically means there is no longer any appreciable enlargement of my pretracheal lymph node that was mentioned in a chest CT Scan done at Hopkins on 8/19/08. He then turned his attention to the probable pseudocyst located at the tail of my pancreas. I was not surprised at all as he gave me an explanation in easy to undestand terms. I had told him that I had the report and had contacted Dr. Makery, my surgeon, regarding the issue. I had sent Dr. Makery the radiologist report and asked if I could send him the study. I showed him the email I exchanged with Dr. Makery. Dr. Makery did not indicate that he wanted to see the study and told me not to worry and no intervention would not be required since I was asymptomatic. While I thought that was nice to read in an email, I would have perferred that Dr. Makery actually look at my study. My primary care physician referred me to an oncologist to hopefully provide me an opinion that the probable pseudocyst is a pseudocyst. I don't mind walking around with a pseudocyst as long as I have an opinion that it is a pseudocyst. I've attached an image from the study of the probable pseudocyst.
It's my birthday today. Thats another year older but I doubt another year wiser. If the weather allows, I'll be headed to my sisters house this afternoon. Some of the family is getting together for dinner and to go to a school function that my nephew is in. It should be a pleasant way to spend my birthday.
I reminisced for a little while this morning about my friend. It seemed there was a time when I always got paired with him when we played. I remember the streak he had where he won the closest to the pin contest during Men's Day for seemed to be 7 or 8 weeks straight. We always had fun and he was very passionate about the game of golf. I always thought it was funny that he was giving me pointers about my golf game. I appreciated the tips but I always thought it was funny since we were both mid handicappers at the time. We always had plenty to talk about and we shared war stories regarding our business experiences. One thing I always admired about my friend is that you always knew where you stood with him and he wasn't afraid to voice his opinion.
I think it was in May, right before I left for Pennsylvania for my kidney stone surgery, I was in the pro shop of the club and going to sign up for Men's Day. I saw my friends name signed up as a single and I jumped at the chance to play with him. We shared the same old topics of conversation but I was seeing something else when we were playing. I was witnessing a man who knew and accepted the fact that his time was limited and he was out living his life to the fullest. I enjoyed that day and his company very much.
As a cancer patient, one of the issues I came to terms with was the fact that I am only human and that death is a possibility no matter what advances there are in modern medicine. Accepting that fact makes it much easier to deal with the illnesses I have and the reality that some day I might have a recurrence or another diagnosis or prognosis where the odds are not in my favor.
Without knowing it, my friend was an inspiration to me and an example of how I would want to be if put in a similar situation. He made tough decisions and didn't stop living.
I kept updated on his condition when I was up north by asking my other friends if he was still playing. I was hoping to have another round of golf with him when I came back but it wasn't to be.
One thing I know for sure is that I will always remember my friend and have the memories of his courage with me as I continue down the path known as life.
It has been an interesting past year to say the least. I'm enjoying my vacation so far. I've been playing golf but I just don't seem to have the passion for the game like I had in the past. Golf just isn't a priority for me anymore. I couldn't wait to get back on the golf course after my kidney cryoablation surgery but I just didn't feel the same way after my distal pancreatomy. I love hanging out with my friends at the golf course but I'm developing other interests and will probably put golf aside for a while to pursue them. I'm also going to be taking a break from making entries in my blog. Nothing will surprise me anymore regarding my health status but I'm hoping that I won't make any entries in my blog after my next round scans and appointments in December.
My appointment schedule for December is filling up fast. I've also had time to sit down and review the performance of my current medical team. I've never been more clear on what I want to accomplish and have come to the conclusion that it would be in my best interest to make some changes again. I've been working hard to make those choices a reality and eventually everything will fall into place. I'm not afraid to make changes as I believe I made the correct choices a year ago. Time will tell about my upcoming choices but unless I'm put in a position where I'm forced to compromise, I won't settle on care like I have in the past year.
I didn't mention this in my last post but the first thing I told Dr. Makary and the three residents was that I was a prick. I didn't mean that in a bad way although some of my business colleagues or staff from the past would probably disagree. I've always had confidence in any task or project that I've undertook. I've been very fortunate and successful in my business career and equally as fortunate, to say the least, in my personal life. I'm very content with my personal life. I'm not flashy by nature and would consider myself a meat and potatoes type guy but I do like to treat myself and go first class if I can when I do something. I lost that confidence for a while but now I feel that its back and I'm back.
I've learned quite a bit on this journey. I've stated in the past that I could put up with a bad bedside manner if the skills where there. I was wrong. I don't believe a doctor is good unless they have a good bedside manner. I know I can have my cake and eat it too. I know it may not always be possible and that I'll probably have to compromise in the future but if there is no immediate need for me to do that, I won't. I may not have the experience of a medical professional but there is one thing I do have plenty experience in and thats over 40 years of how to treat other people the way I would want to be treated. I may have high standards but thats the way I am, I always want the best possible.
I've got a few more issues to look into but all I can do is say NEXT.
Side Humor. I had a little fun with Dr. Makary. During our consult, he mentioned he wasn't good with email. Of course I couldn't resist and sent him an email thanking him for taking as much time with me as he did. I had sent him an email when I was scheduled for the EUS and included a little blurb about "being on the same page" as I was waiting for his office to schedule the surgery since there was a time frame involved for surgery once the tumor was inked. He has also published an article or two on operating room personnel being on the same page. I was going to reference the articles in the email but didn't and he missed the pun. When he visited me in the hospital room, he changed the conversation by making a comment about the broadband internet card I had in my laptop and how he had one also. I also knew he published a paper on using Google and the Internet to find medical information. I figured chances are he is computer literate and thus couldn't resist as I do have a weird sense of humor. Of course the first line of my email was to the fact that I know you said you were no good with email but didn't you publish a paper about google and the internet? I included a smiley face. I received a nice short response back but one this is for sure, for a doctor, he is very hip and patient friendly. Don't worry doc, if I need anything in the future, I will contact your office. ![]()
I had an appointment today with Dr. Martin Makary, the surgeon who performed my distal pancreatomy laparoscopically at Johns Hopkins on September 5, 2008.
I know it's never a good thing to have surgery, but if you are ever in the position where you are a candidate to have this type of surgery done laparoscopically, I'd highly recommend it. There is something to be said about minimally invasive surgery in the hands of a skilled surgeon. My pain level after surgery was never over 1.5 on a scale of 1-10. The only reason I used the button on the pain pump was to keep ahead of the pain if it ever came. A lesson I learned when I said no to medication after my kidney cancer surgery. I don't think I ever needed it and after the pain pump was removed a few days after the surgery, I never needed to take any pain medication. The only real discomfort I had was when I started eating regular food and that lasted about a week.
Let me tell you, Dr. Makary should be the role model for other doctors in how to treat patients. Patients talk about good and bad bedside manner. He has neither, he has a GREAT bedside manner. He set the tone early when he said he would take as much time with me as needed. There were also three resident present during the consult which I thought was great since I love working with them.
We first went over my history on how I ended up at Hopkins in the first place.
He then took a look at my incisions to which he said they looked like they were healing nicely. I've had two laparoscopic surgeries and I can barely tell which incisions are from which surgery.
I then took the opportunity to give him some feedback. The first thing I told them was that it made the biggest difference in the world to me that they treated me like a person instead of a disease. That was true from when I went to the Pancreatic Multidisciplinary Clinic all the way up to this consult. I told the group that patients know why they are seeing specialists and that being treated like a human makes a big difference. I know when I've been treated like a human, I act like a team player. I then mentioned that they should expect any patient under 40 to be interested in their illness and that they probably have researched that illness thoroughly on the internet. I then gave the group one example on why I consider Dr. Makary to have a great bedside manner. I told the group how cool it was and how reassuring it was to me the patient, how Dr. Makary was there the entire time with me in pre-op. He was in his street clothes and when the time came to get wheeled into the operating room, he was right next to me and peeled off to change and scrub before I entered the operating room.
I then start asking questions. My first question was how much of my pancreas did you have to remove and were there negative margins. He drew a diagram and told me he removed about 2cm of the tail and that margins were negative. I really didn't need to know how much he removed but I figured it would be some nice information to have if I share war stories or give support to other patients. I then asked when my spleen was removed, was any pathology performed and did they take and test any lymph nodes. That led to a printout of the pathology report and I was told the pathology was unremarkable (good) from the spleen and that 14 lymph nodes were removed and negative for tumor. Needless to say, this was good news and as Dr. Makary would say, I hit a home run.
I then asked about malignant versus benign. He explained that with islet cell tumor, there really isn't a malignant or benign but that one could be considered to have a malignant tumor if there is metastasis. This was right in line with my research and of course I was happy that the tumor was local to my pancreas.
I knew I had heart issues during the surgery and recovery and asked what they were. He explained which led to me getting a copy of the Operative Report. There is also another report that they will either be sent to me via snail mail or email.
We then briefly talked about follow up to which he made himself available to read studies if needed. I'm trying to avoid the long term effects of ct scans and hoping scans for my renal cell carcinoma will be sufficient for both.
Needless to say, I'm very happy with the way this turned out and that I'm in the best possible position I could be in. I'm quite aware by my research and by reading other patients stories how fortunate I am with this incidental finding. I read the Johns Hopkins Pancreatic Discussion Board every day and if anybody posts with the same presentation I did, you can be sure I'll point them to my blog, tell my story and offer any assistance I can to them. I'm also thankful for all the effort from the people along the way. From the General Surgeon and Gastroenterologist at Geisinger, to the entire staff at Johns Hopkins. THANKS FOR A JOB WELL DONE.
One of the contributors to the blog and to the New York Times Health section is a surgeon and well known author from Massachusetts. Some of her blog topics include, “Doctors and Patients Start Talking”, “Taking Time for Empathy”,”Are Doctors treating the Diagnosis or the Patient” and “Bad News delivered Badly”. Its very interesting to see the view from the other side of the table and to know they get just as frustrated as patients in certain situations.
The topic with the most comments, from both patients and doctors is “Doctors and Patients Start Talking”, which is a link to an article entitled “Healing the Doctor-Patient Relationship”. There are 400+ comments from both patients and doctors with each one not afraid to give their two cents. One issue I agree with is that there can always be better communication between doctor and patient.
Many of the comments are valid from both sides of the issues. There are many issues involved in health care and it doesn't always come down to the quality of doctor-patient relationships. I can't list them all but I'm sure insurance companies tie the hands of physicians by limiting the types of treatments they can provide by not approving tests/procedures that are more expensive and may be of more diagnostic value than cheaper tests. I'm also aware the doctors have to make a living as well and that factors into the equation. Then you have outside influences like drug companies and medical equipment manufacturers who offer consideration for physicians to prescribe their drugs and use their equipment.
I have my own philosophies in choosing a provider. I try to stay away from private practice. I choose a not for profit (is there really such a thing?) for a reason. This mainly means teaching hospitals and professionals who do plenty of research. I also see a better infrastructure or investments in technology that benefits both physicians and patients. I know the physicians are getting a salary and their bottom line isn't affected if they see me or not. I'm not naive but I am optimistic and I believe they want to make a positive difference in a patients life although I do get the impression that they would rather be doing research than seeing me sometimes. I also like the fact that some institutions have a policy in limiting physician contact with pharmaceutical companies. Is it perfect? No. This strategy just coincides with my belief of trying to put myself in the best position possible for a positive outcome.
Since I was diagnosed with kidney cancer, I've become quite interested in my own health issues and a big believer in patient empowerment. I'm also like every other patient, I want the best possible health care available to me.
I'm the eternal optimist and have gone into each first consult with an open mind and I've trusted each specialist I've met so far to give me an opinion. I've been fortunate that I've received correct diagnoses and plans of action that are within accepted guidelines for those diagnosis.
I have no illusions that doctors are not perfect and am fully aware I have many faults also. Contrary to what doctors would like to believe, they are human and capable of mistakes just like everybody else.
It's not pleasant being on the receiving end of rant from a doctor and it really isn't pleasant hearing the words “I don't care” in any statement directed at me. This happened during the second consult with my first urologist. At my third consult to discuss the ct scan I had two days after the second consult, I took control at the beginning of the consult and told him we had to talk before we went over the scans. I was fully aware that he thought I was challenging his credentials at the second consult and I told him all the steps I took to get a good reference on him including researching the awards he won while in school and the positive references other medical professionals had given me. I got the distinct impression that it made him feel better and more comfortable. I then told him all the emotions I was going through. My professional background wouldn't let me show any weakness if I wanted to be successful and true to form, I wasn't showing any emotion during my first few consults. I could tell he was surprised when I told him the emotions I was experiencing when I finally heard the word cancer associated with me. My next question was obvious, “What did you mean by your statements at our last consult? I really didn't know what to expect but the bottom line was his answer wasn't good enough for me to trust him anymore. I still didn't question his medical knowledge or opinions he provided to me but I didn't have the trust needed to pursue a surgical resolution with him.
I give feedback to the doctors I see and if they want to discuss, fine. Do they listen? I don't care if they do but I tell them for my own piece of mind and also just to put that thought in their heads. I know the doctor-patient relationship is a two way street and both can end the relationship at any time for any reason. I don't wish illness on anybody but doctors get to find out the hard way when they become patients. There is an article on the blog called “When Doctors Become Patients”. The author also has published a book with that name. It's a very interesting read to say the least on how views change and how eyes are opened when the shoe is on the other foot.
I'm also continually learning as I go from specialist to specialist and from institution to institution. Its very interesting how each has their own style or way of doing things. I do see differences and they do and will have an impact on who I choose as a provider in the future. I've picked who I thought can get me the best outcome, regardless of institution but the institution will play a factor in my future decisions. I'm not totally oblivious or naive and know the issues behind why certain things are done. I've had surgeries at two different institutions. One institution sent me a “Not a Bill” invoice stating they would have billed my insurance company almost $90,000 for my care but billed my insurance company about $14,000 instead. The other institution only sent me a notice what they were actually billing the insurance company. I know there is a business behind health care but from my point of view, I definitely get the impression that the second institution wants to project a more caring attitude towards the patient.
I'm very fortunate to have a core team that I trust. My primary care physician is top notch. I came to him with many issues and helped me immensely with my long term health goals and to get me into a position for a positive outcome with my immediate needs. I don't fight him on any issue. There have been bumps in the road but I've worked hard on having a good working relationship with his team. I have no illusion of what goes on in the clinic every day. He has patients lined up every 15 minutes and every day must be a war. I know they are human and are capable of making mistakes. God knows they have witnessed me when I haven't been at my best. One thing is for sure, it's very easy to act like a team member and forget mistakes that may and do happen when I have no doubt they have my best interests at heart and they treat me like a person first and not a disease or a 15 minute time slot.
As I've mentioned before, I do my own research on the diseases I've been diagnosed with. I'd say researching islet cell/neuroendocrine tumors is much more difficult than researching renal cell carcinoma only because of how rare the disease is.
I like to use pubmed and Google Scholar to search for information about my diseases. Its nice to read abstracts but if I find an article/study that is on point with my diagnosis and has a recent date of publication and is from an author with a good reputation or medical center that is considered a leader or high volume center for my disease, I'll read the whole article. One item I like is that there is usually a discussion at the end of the article/study where other doctors ask the authors questions. Doctors have to keep up on diseases/treatments in their specialty and you can bet, if they are any good, they are most likely reading the same articles I am. I'm also very fortunate to have tons of medical professions in my support group so I can ask questions if I don't understand anything in the articles. I also like the fact that most of the questions are ones that I would ask my provider.
One issue that I am aware of is that doctors don't always like answering my questions. This is another reason I like reading articles on point because with the questions that are asked in the articles, doctors have no problem answering other doctors questions. Some doctors have excellent communication skills and can be subtle and change the subject but I'm quite aware what they are doing and that they didn't answer my question. I also believe the doctor is making a decision of what he believes what is in my best interest on how much information I need to know. I believe this is one of the reasons why I seem to have a love/hate relationship with my providers. I've come to accept thats the way I am and its how medicine works but I haven't lost site that our goals to get a positive outcome are the same.
Its one thing to want to read the article, its another thing to actually get your hands on it. The articles are referenced in the abstracts so I know what periodical they were published in and when. This is where my experience in computer science comes in. I loved Adobe Acrobat when it first came out because it made it easy to disseminate information. There is a good chance that somebody has the article in Acrobat format. Google has an advanced search function to look for file types and I tell Google to look for PDF file types. There is also a good probability that somebody doesn't know copyright laws and has posted it somewhere on the web. There is also a probability that the institution that the authors who published the article have it posted somewhere on their site. It doesn't always work so there are a few other options to get your hands on the article. You can run down to the local hospital and ask the librarian to get the article for you or you can subscribe and pay a fee to a service that references the articles. I don't have any problem paying a subscription fee even though it can get expensive sometimes.
I found many an abstract and article (1)(2) regarding my conditions. Yes, I being cute in using references to two of the few articles I've read both before and after I sought a second opinoin. I'm not going to hotlink them because I didn't ask for permission from the author.
I didn't come to my decision to seek a second opinion on my own because I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express or I didn't like the first opinion. I read articles and the questions doctors asked regarding my condition. It didn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that an aggressive approach was a prudent way to handle my tumor in my case. I'm relatively young and I'm aware this was a factor in the opinion of resection. I don't know if they would recommend surgery for somebody who is 80 years old with the same size tumor I had, but I was only looking at myself. When you read opinions from what I consider leading researchers in my disease and they recommend an aggressive approach and resection, thats what I'm going to seek out.
Learning Medical terms and what I consider basic concepts
I'm not trying to be a doctor and I'm not trying to be difficult with my provider. If I'm in their office, I'm already comfortable with their credentials. I don't even see a need to interview them if their credentials are impeccable just like with my surgeon at Hopkins. I know from past experience that at least one of my providers thought I was challenging his credentials when I was asking questions and that was the furthest thing from my mind. His response to my question was not to pleasant. I'm not one to back down and had no problem confronting this provider face to face regarding this but thats another story and irrelevant now.
I like to know basic medical terms and what they mean. This knowledge helps me understand my condition and also lets me understand the doctor if he uses any medical terms. I believe this helps me deal with the long term implications of the disease I've been diagnosed with.
I don't really like the term cancer or the word tumor. Its only a preference but I think the term neoplasm is sexier. I know it doesn't mean anything but I am who am I and like what I like.
I believe everyone knows the difference between the words malignant and benign. I like the fact that I have not yet received an opinion of malignant regarding my neuroendocrine tumor.
Its also prudent to know what the word differentiation means. In my case, I like seeing the word well differentiated because that usually means the cells that make up my tumor are close to looking like what mature cells are supposed to look like. It usually means indolent and slow growing. I don't like seeing poorly differentiated because that usually means the cells that make up the tumor don't closely resemble the appearance of normal cells and that it usually means fast growing.
I also like to know what the term margin actually means. Positive margins mean they didn't get all of the tumor and you still have residual tumor after resection. Negative margins mean they “got it all” but in my mind, there is some grey area in that depending on what pathologist is reading your slides because some consider one normal cell good enough for a negative margin while some have a different standard of needing 2mm of normal cells to have a negative margin.
There is something also out there known as resection ratings. There are basically three ratings, R0, R1 and R2. My understanding from reading the articles referenced and this is only pertaining to islet cell tumors is that resection is usually recommended when a resection rating of R0 or R1 can be achieved, which basically means having resection will help the patient. Regarding Islet Cell, that usually means the word year is used instead of months when trying to extend a patients life expectency. R0 basically means that the patient will be histologically (pathology report) free of tumor after resection. R1 basically means there is residual disease (including metastasis) left behind after resection. R2 basically means there would be gross residual disease left behind. From my understanding, that usually means the patient has presented with disease that can't be dealt with in a curative manner (a R0 or R1 rating can't be achieved through resection) and that means palliative treatment which can still add plenty of time to a patients life.
There is also a term I hate with a passion. That would be “We got it all” when the surgeon tells a patient the outcome of the surgery. When a patient hears those words, they think they are free and clear for the rest of their lives. I believe it to mean that the tumor I had was successfully resected and that an R0 rating was achieved. I've also received one explanation from a surgeon about “microscopic cancer cells” which I thought was enlightening. I've read too many patient experiences where they were told “We got it all” only to be devastated when either months later or years later they have a recurrence and metastatic disease. I know my prognosis from my renal cell carcinoma is the best I could hope for. I'm a realist and I know that even with my good prognosis, there could be dormant (for lack of a better word) clear cell carcinoma cancer cells somewhere in my body and not yet detectable or growing. I also know that the doctor can not tell me with 100% certainty that I won't have a recurrence down the road.
What does this mean to me in my case?
I know some might think this is too much information for a patient. Thats what opinions are for. I read my medical reports and am aware of what my health status was before I had the surgery. I know I can't be 100% , I know possibilities but I see a provider and ask questions for a reason , but according to any ct scan or mri I had, I didn't have any enlarged lymph nodes near my pancreas which could be considered suspicious for disease. Even though it probably isn't 100% accurate, even though my spleen was removed, crushed, pureed, liquidfied or whatever the correct term is and removed via a bag, the FNA I had only revealed normal cells in the mass I had on my spleen. I've read that neuroendocrine tumors can metastasize to the spleen. I also know another common site for metastasis is the liver. I know from previous ct scans and mri's that my liver is clear even though I know there is a small mass that is to small to identify but most likely a cyst according to the radiologist report. I also know in the past, that a patient needed to present with metastasis to get a diagnosis of a malignant mass. I also know that my mass was incidentally caught and small. I know my case is not the norm and there is not much information out there. I am aware of two cases where the tumor was less than 2cm, resected and benign but the patient later had recurrence of islet cell to their liver. Conclusion: I know there is a good probability that my tumor is benign. Although I'm concerned about receiving the final pathology, I'm not going to sweat the results. I've read enough to know that in this case, even when malignant or even when dealing with metastasis, the chance of long term survival is good because of the indolent nature of the disease. Think of it as knowing the worst and hoping for the best. I'm also aware and hopeful that future research will offer treatments not yet available. There are plenty of dedicated researchers out there doing their thing. One word I also hate is “Kaplan-Meir”. Its basically a curve or algorithm that calculates probabilities and is used by researchers when doing a study. I like to know the probabilities but I'm also aware that each patients case is unique and I really can't go by studies. Its nice to know that I have about a 96% chance that I won't experience a recurrence regarding my renal cell carcinoma, but my case is unique and only time will tell. I like to know the possibilities and am a realist. Thats the way I roll and knowing the possibilities helps me deal with the disease. I don't think about cancer or have a cancer alert go off if I have a sore back or feel funny in my flanks or abdomen. I just refuse to be a prisoner and as long as I have a good quality of life, I'm happy. I have some questions for my surgeon but not many. I know before going in that he can't tell me with 100% certainty what my future will be. I know my research has been incomplete in the past and I've been corrected by my provider because I asked the questions. All I know is that no matter what I discuss with my surgeon at the upcoming appointment, I won't stop living my life when I leave the office.
References:
Resection of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors, Results of 70 Cases; Kevork K. Kanzanjian, MD; Howard A. Reber, MD; Oscar J. Hines, MD; Arch Surg. 2006;141:765-770.
Aggressive Surgical Resection in the Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: When is it indicated?; Pamela J. Hodul, MD, Jonathan R. Strosberg, MD and Larry K. Kvols, MD; Cancer Control, October 2008, Vol. 15. No. 4;
Its probably one of the toughest tasks in the world. I can probably write tons about this subject and not even come close to covering all the issues.
I know I didn't have a clue how my uncle and best friend felt when he was diagnosed with a neuroendocrine (carcinoid) tumor in his small-bowel. Much to my chagrin, I found out exactly how he felt a few years later. Just like my aunt, I was right there with him every day in the hospital when he went through his surgery and when he was recovering. I can tell you, its takes a big physical and mental toll on the caregiver to be there for all those days and hours. Its also very hard to see somebody you love in pain and also suffering. All you can do is be there by their side and offer as much support as possible. It doesn't have to be words of encouragement, it can just be a touch of the hand and they know they are not alone. I know when I was having complications after my kidney cancer surgery, it made all the difference in the world to me to know that he was just there and with me late into the early hours of the morning.
I was also there for him after the surgery. My uncle followed up with an oncologist at Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida. They have an excellent reputation and his oncologist has one of the best reputations for treating carcinoids. Every cancer patient knows about the possibility of recurrence. All fear it and some handle it better than others. Getting scanned for cancer can definitely make your stress level go through the roof, especially the first few times. Take into account one of the first things you see at a place like Moffitt, is other cancer patients getting treatment. I know it broke my heart to see young children there and that alone can put the fear of God into someone. I know he was very anxious and stressed out for the first two years whenever he was scanned. I did all I could do to support him and told him many a time how much I loved him.
About twelve years ago, my uncle also had surgery for a tumor on one of his lungs. Navy pathologists got sent a sample of the tumor and couldn't even identify the type of tumor. Every two years, he goes for a broncosopy to make sure he is all clear. Yesterday was that day. My aunt wasn't available and I did the same thing he did for me, I supported him in any way I could and took him for his appointment.
He gets anxious and his blood pressure was high. The nurse also had trouble getting his IV in on the first shot. One thing about this procedure and hospital is that they let me stay with him every minute except when they took him into the suite where they actually do the procedure. When they finally did take him away, I gave him a hug, told him I loved him and that everything was going to be ok. I was very happy when I met with the doctor and he said everything looked great.
One thing I noticed when he was "waking up" after the procedure, is that he kept asking me the same question over and over again. I know I got a pretty potent cocktail when I had my first endoscopy procedure and was asking the doctor the same question over and over. I'm still surprised that at my second endoscopy procedure at Hopkins, I was fully awake and totally alert when I woke up after the procedure.
It took about two and half hours before he was released but I did all I could to help him and make him feel better. I kept telling him the doctor said he was clear and I think I spent over an hour rubbing his back when he sat up because it made him feel better. I also took pictures of him with my cell phone and sent them and a text message to my aunt to let her know everything was ok.
He has been one of my biggest supporters during the past year and I was just happy that I could be there for him when he needed some support.
It's a never ending learning curve as I travel through the world of medicine. I know I'm continually analyzing and reassessing events along the way. I'm not afraid to admit I've made a few mistakes but one thing is for sure, I'm believe I'm getting the hang of it or at least I have something that is working for me.
My Core Team. I love my working relationship with my PCP and also my cardiologist and his staff. I have discussed many an issue with them and have no problem feeling comfortable enough to be candid with them. They also have gone beyond the call of duty and helped me get through roadblocks when I've run into issues.
My Friends and Family. They offer so much support and pearls of wisdom. I know by experience that one doesn't always see the whole picture when dealing with emotional situations. Its so much easier when you are looking from the outside in to evaluate a situation. My friends and family have been very supportive. In the beginning, I went to all my appointments by myself, now I try to bring a second set of ears with me as much as I can if I think the situation warrants it. I'm fortunate enough to have access to many medical professionals if I need them. I really don't like using them if I'm seeing somebody but I won't hesitate to ask general questions about procedures and issues like that. I've also learned not to discuss everything with my mother. I love my mother and I value her experience as an operating room nurse but she will always be my mother first and not be objective by default.
Medical Professionals. I'm not talking about my core team or specialists I've seen. I'm talking about all the people I've met in the operating rooms, the endoscopy suites, radiology, nurses and support staffs in the hospitals and in clinics. All have made what could be a difficult situation easy. I'm always satisfied when I go through a procedure and I have no complications. I can't write about everybody but I loved the pre-op staff at Hopkins. The anesthesiologist was great even though she was a Steeler fan and the nurse anesthetist was a gem. The operating room nurses were easy to work with and were very professional and pleasant at the same time. I had no stress and all I had to do was sit back and let the surgeon do his thing.
I loved the gastroenterologist at Hopkins. He just spoke my language (giving me percentages) when he answered my questions. I even got a smile from the attending physician when I started asking questions about the different types of dyes that could be used. Just like at Geisinger, all the support staff were great and easy to work with. I learned not to jinx the nurse at Hopkins like I did at Geisinger as she got my IV done in one shot.
Doctors/Specialists. I haven't met a doctor yet that didn't know their specialty. I think about who I am dealing with: pioneers, researchers, people who have had a passion since they were young and followed through on their dreams of becoming a doctor. They have all gone through years of training to get where they are. All they want to do is make a positive difference in a persons life. I also know they are just as passionate about their craft as I am with mine. This is where I think medicine is part art form and science. Some doctors are just as gifted in their specialty as they are in the art of communication.
When I walk into the door of a doctors office for the first time, I've done my homework and have checked out their credentials and probably have a good reference or two. The first thing that I think about is whether or not I'm going to trust the doctor. There is no rhyme or reason to how I arrive at my decision to trust or not, its just basic instincts.
The first person/people I chat up is the doctors staff. If they like their job and think the doctor they are working for is good, they have no problem showing their pride and letting me know they think their doctor is the best. I also chat up the nurses in places like the endoscopy suites and they are the same way, they will let you know if the doctor is good or not.
Doctors are some the most confident people I've met. Let's face it, a doctor without confidence is not somebody I want to be treated by. I've always thought I was a good judge of character but trying to get a read on a doctor is almost useless because they are so confident and they have no problem showing that trait. I'm a quiet person by nature but I have no problems chatting up a doctor. I'm interviewing them as much as they me during an H&P. I ask questions to try to and get them to talk about themselves. If they won an award, been recognized for their work, have had research papers published or do something like give lectures at medical conferences, I ask. I'm also trying to read them by body language. Once I make that determination of trust, its time to get evaluated.
Doctor/Patient relationships are probably one of the toughest types of relationships. The stakes are very high. The deck is totally stacked against the doctor to begin with. Especially if you are going to a specialist, a patient is already emotionally charged and already knows or has an idea of what the problem is and probably is thinking the worse.
I know I've learned along the way. I've learned not to get emotionally attached to my doctors. I know I was very emotional and attached to my first urologist because I was scared, I was dealing with the diagnosis of cancer for the first time and because I liked him very much. I should have went back to Pennsylvania after my second consult. I have plenty of respect for him because of his medical ability, his journey to become a doctor and also because when I look at my bottom line and put all the distractions aside, he helped me. I think communication could have been better on both sides.
One thing I won't do is go against my instincts anymore. I went against my instincts with the urologist who treated my kidney stones. This may seem insignificant but something as simple as not getting a handshake should have told me all I needed to know. I know if I was interviewing somebody for a position at a firm I was working for and they didn't offer their hand for a handshake when I first met them, they wouldn't get to a second interview. When the urologist entered the exam room, I stood up to greet the doctor and started to extend my hand for a handshake. When I realized the doctor was not going to extend their hand, besides making me feeling like a fool, a red flag went up in my head. I ignored it. I wasn't thrilled with the way events panned out, but I've learned to put it behind me.
One of the most passionate people I've met so far is the general surgeon I saw for my spleen. I knew he cared allot about me. I never saw anybody work as hard to get me a resolution. He brainstormed at each of my consults and at my second consult, he thought “out of the box” and offered me a resolution that he didn't offer at my first consult. That of course was the EUS/FNA. I knew there was a possibility before I walked in the door that a splenectomy might be in my future. I'm a prick about protocols and I got upset before I even got to the exam room because his nurse told me that patients who have splenectomies get immunization shots. I felt like I was in a car dealership and they were pushing for a sale only for the fact she couldn't wait before I got to an exam room to give me that information. Get me into an exam room and tell me anything you want, then I'll take it in the proper context. I lost my composure for a while and I know I ranted when I got interviewed by the resident. I also got upset when a scheduler told me about an appointment for a pre-surgery interview. I knew a splenectomy might be recommended and I knew that was a possibility the doctor mentioned at the first consult. I got upset because I didn't have an opinion yet and I knew the appointment meant I got scheduled for surgery and a splenectomy. I'm thinking what does the doctor know that he hasn't told me yet. I know I could have put an end to it right there by picking up the phone and asking but I'm stubborn and getting scheduled for surgery is something I want to hear from the doctor and not a scheduler. What did I learn from this? I know I overreacted and everything was unintentional. That doesn't mean I shouldn't have been concerned but I'm not one to kiss anybodies ass and its just my nature to like and care about someone who making an effort to help me even if there are some distractions. I know my goal and the doctors goal were the same, get a positive outcome. It just goes to show there can always be better communication from both sides in doctor/patient relationships. I know I like and care about this doctor very much but I didn't get emotionally attached like I had in the past where it hindered my own judgment. We ended up having different opinions of the neuroendocrine tumor and there was nothing wrong with that.
By the time I got through the clinic at Hopkins, my philosophy had evolved regarding doctor/patient relationships. Communication on both sides is very important. I'm always looking at my bottom line and thats the most important thing. Its just the nature of the beast that distractions occur. I look at every relationship now as me being a partner. Through my blog, I've been able to communicate with other patients of the urologist who treated my kidney cancer. One fact we talk about is how he asked each of us to be his partner and how each one of us jumped at the chance. I know it made me feel good and I would have jumped through any hoop for him because of it. Its great to be asked to be a partner but now I act like a partner regardless when I'm seeing someone. I know I have to work just as hard as anyone to get the best outcome I can.
It wasn't easy getting to the operating room at Hopkins. There were communication breakdowns along the way. Hopkins is a different animal compared to Geisinger in terms of the way things are done and what I'm used to. I was like a fish out of water. I know I have a certain comfort level at Geisinger mainly because of their patient front end called mygeisinger. Mygeisinger allows me to view parts of my medical record online which includes innoculations, lab results and upcoming appointments. It also allows me to communicate electronically with my providers. I can send messages and know when they are read via a time stamp on the message. As far as I could tell, Hopkins doesn't have a tool like this. I know mygeisinger helped me immensely even though I was being treated at Hopkins. I had to provide lab results to the clinic at Hopkins. All I had to do is go to mygeisinger and print them out. I also used mygeisinger to get information I didn't have access to faxed to Hopkins. I used every asset I had at my disposal to get me to that operating room. The people at Geisinger and Hopkins each helped me immensely. The bottom line is that I didn't get upset like I would have in the past and I was totally relaxed and stress free when I finally got to the operating room.
I'm learning along the way just like everyone else. I know I've received excellent care from each provider I've encountered. I know how important communication is. I just now have the experience to know what is important and what I shouldn't sweat. I know everyone is doing everything they can to help me. I know I won't hesitate to ask in the future and to leave my ego and stubbornness checked at the door and just think clearly. I'm still going to be prudent about what provider I see, but I'm not going to let distractions get the better of me anymore.
I've never really given a description about me other than a few words here and there. A few of my friends know the real me but not many because by nature, I am a very private person. Well, here goes nothing. I'm 43, born and raised in the Bronx, New York, I guess you say I have New York street smarts. My parents divorced when I was 2 or 3. I never had much contact with my father and when I reached a certain age, I really didn't care. My extended family was small and my grandfather became my father and male role model.
What can I say about my mother? She calls me "fresh", mainly because I joke with her allot and will say anything to her. She has been one of my biggest supporters since my diagnosis. I also like to use all the gems she used on me when I was growing up. You know, when she said "We'll see" that meant NO. After my parents divorced, my mother went back to college and became a registered nurse. I'd say she did a good job being a parent, she was raising three kids, studying to become a nurse and being a provider at the same time. I'd say she is a strong woman and stubborn, once she made up her mind, that was it, I'd say I get that quality from her.
My brother and sister are just like any other brother or sister. They have been very supportive. I'm very glad I've reconnected with my sister. We all have our own lives but I know if any of us need help, the others will step up to the plate.
I spent plenty of time when I was growing up with my grandparents. My grandfather was the strong and silent type. He never said much but when he opened his mouth, you knew it was serious and you listened. When he was sick and dying with cancer, I would come home from school in the afternoon and help take care of him. He spent allot of time in bed and I would have to help him out of bed and basically hold him up while we walked to the bathroom and he relieved himself. I never once heard him moan or complain. I know I get most of my strength now because of my experience with him.
I also spent plenty of time with my aunt. I was very close with her. I still remember the day she suffered a brain aneurysm. She was brain dead and was on life support before she was allowed to pass. I was a teenager and never wanted to go to the hospital to visit her because I didn't want to remember her that way. I think about her allot but I always think of the good times we had. I miss her.
I was an average student through grammar and high school. I was never motivated until I had to pay for my own education out of my own pocket. I originally went to college to become a pharmacist. I worked in a drug store while I was in grammar school and in high school. I loved the lectures but hated the labs with a passion. I would rather go do something else than spend 3 hours with test tubes and the bad smell of chemicals. I then decided to pursue a career in computers. I earned a degree in computer science and I'm also a few classes short of having a degree in accounting. I always had the intention of finishing the accounting but never got around to it. I did continue my education but it was always a continuing education course in programming/computer science. I wasn't always the brightest color in the crayon box but I worked hard and finished with a 3.88 gpa.
I had a successful career while I was living in New York city, working in the financial sector, mainly financial printers and wall street firms. I've always worked in very political environments and have a pretty good on board politically correct language translator which I also call a BS meter. I'm a firm believer in proper protocols and I'm also very detailed oriented. I loved working under pressure and the adrenaline rush it gave me when a crisis was resolved or a time sensitive project was completed successfully. I also loved the working relationships I forged because we all worked together for a common goal and mostly everyone I worked closely with was just as dedicated as me to get the task done. I enjoyed a great career and held a good position with a fine firm. I had a great salary, extraordinary bonuses, outstanding benefits and quirks. All of these benefits come with a price. I probably worked an average of 55-65 hours a week. At busy times of the year, it was probably more like 75-80 hours a week plus weekends. I didn't mind because if I walked in the door on a weekend, it was a generous stipend in my pocket per shift even though I was salaried. I was also in a rotation to do system backups on the weekends anyway and didn't mind spending the 4-5 hours it took to do the backups. It was quiet time and I got to catch up on my projects when nobody was around and believe me, you get more done in 4 hours when you are alone versus 10 hours of dealing with phone calls and production. There was a time when I probably went over a year without a vacation or had a weekend off. That was when I was a systems manager and responsible for a 24 hour data center with network connections in three major cities so I was responsible for supporting them also. I also know I annoyed the crap out of some of my friends and co-workers because I always held my cards close to my chest and they knew I was very calculating always running scenerios through my head. I guess you can call that the analyst in me. I also can quote people verbatim from conversations years ago which also bugs the crap out of one of my friends.
I don't really know why but I just lost the desire and didn't get that adrenaline rush anymore. I also didn't want to put in the time required. I was very loyal to the owner of my firm. This was a firm that everyone in the business wanted to work for because of all the benefits the owner provided. One benefit was that we had accounts with many fine restaurants and employees were provided breakfast, lunch or dinner. It didn't help my waistline any but it sure beat eating subs or grabbing a dirty water dog from a street vendor although I must say there is something to be said about the taste of a New York city dirty water dog. There were other reasons for my resigning but I felt if I couldn't give 100%, I wasn't giving the owner all the effort he deserved. I was probably one of only two or three people that ever resigned from this firm. The owner always wanted to do an exit interview with me but it never happened.
While I loved living and working in New York City, I came to appreciate the suburban lifestyle. Over the years in New York, I kept moving farther away from the city. I ended up living in Harrison, New York and loved that type of setting. I ended up leaving New York and purchasing a home in the State College area of Pennsylvania. I made a career change to self-employed computer consultant. I'm fortunate enough to be able to set my own schedule.
I'm starting to get that itch again and am considering another career, either something in IT or going back to school for another discipline. I've recently began to explore the programs at Penn State since I live 5 minutes away from the main campus. I enjoyed interviewing and getting offered a position last January. I enjoyed putting on a suit again and must admit that I like to dress up and that I'm a Hart, Schaffner and Marx man. I think I have almost 20 suits in my closet that haven't been worn in years. Even though I dress totally casual and you can call it a pet peeve of mine but I must admit that I check out the couture of the doctors I meet. It has nothing to do with their credentials but I look at it as an intangible quality. So far, I've been most impressed with my surgeon at Hopkins.
I have no regrets about anything I've done in my past that may have caused my maladies. I also have no fear of the future. I don't really know how to explain it but I don't fear the future because I don't feel cheated regarding the quality of my life. There are some things you can't control (I don't mean lessening risk factors via lifestyle changes) and recurrence is one of them. I don't worry about scans. I probably embrace scans because the result will tell me two things, I'm NED or chances are a new issue has been caught early and I need additional treatment. I know I've been fortunate with early detection and all I can do is live my life and if I happen to have another serious medical issue, hope that its caught early also. By all rights, I probably should have died back in 2005 when I had my heart attack so every day since then is gravy. I actually think if anything is going to get me, it will be a stroke or heart problems. I have plenty of hope and won't embrace death, but if I'm ever in a palliative position, I'll know when to fold my cards and I won't put myself through any treatments where the risk/reward ratio isn't to my benefit.
I've always been able to absorb and learn new computer technologies and have had plenty of time to research and learn as much as I can about maladies now that I believe in patient empowerment. I look at it that if I'm every caught with a bad outcome, I want to be the one responsible and not the doctor. Doctors can walk away when all is said and done, I can't. I'm not trying to be a doctor but I have to be in full agreement with the plan of action they suggest. I think that learning as much as I can has been an asset although I know it probably annoys my providers. I'm not one to put my head in the sand and I believe in general, the younger the person is the more they are going to investigate and learn about their medical conditions when they are diagnosed with a serious condition. I also read a few medical professional blogs on the web and am amazed what really is going through their heads when they are treating patients, this is probably too much information for me but I like to see a view from the other side of the table. My priorities have changed since my diagnosis of cancer. Issues that were important to me in the past mean nothing now. I believe I'm continually learning and more flexible in my thinking now although I do believe many issues are black and white. I run many an issue through my core team just to make sure I'm not loosing my sanity. One of the things I do is that I continually analyze and reaccess my experiences.
I know there was a period of time that I wasn't very functional and was very emotional. I know I'm back now and have a ton of confidence. I just march to my own beat.
It's 2008 and the Internet is pretty much used by almost everyone on a daily basis.
The Internet can be a good place to research your medical conditions if you know how to use the resource.
When I was first diagnosed with kidney cancer, I did what most people with a computer did, I hit the Internet looking for information. I was not in the correct frame of mind to do this and found many a story with a bad ending. I fell into the trap of assuming the worse and had myself convinced that my prognosis was not good. When I got shocked back into reality by my first urologist, I started to research properly.
I was the typical male who really didn't take an interest in my health status and trusted my primary care doctor to cover all the bases for me. I realized very quickly that approach was not in my best interest and that the only one who should be calling the shots is me. I quickly became a believer in patient empowerment.
It didn't take me long to figure out there were different treatment options for kidney cancer. My research also told me to find a urologist who specialized in kidney cancer. It also wasn't tough to figure out that not all urologists specialize in kidney cancer and those that do, might not offer every possible option because they are not trained in that specialty.
Until recently, the "gold standard" for kidney cancer was radical nephrectomy. The reality of the situation is that not all urologists are trained or have the skills to offer a solution other than a radical nephrectomy. Lets face it, patients are dealing with the stress of hearing the word "cancer" and may not be operating at full mental capacity. Their first instinct is to get that cancer out of them as fast as they can. I know I was very emotional in the beginning and it took me a while to process all the information correctly. The sad reality is that many patients are not aware or educate themselves about all the possible treatments for kidney cancer. The end result is that some patients will end up with a radical nephrectomy because they don't know about and investigate other treatment options. They also won't seek a second opinion and will follow their physcian blindly. Many will end up with a radical nephrectomy because the urologist they are seeing will only offer them a radical nephrectomy because they still believe that is still the "gold standard".
Experience counts. Another lesson I learned quickly was that experience counts. I believe its fair to assume that the more times a surgeon performs a procedure, the better they will be at it. I also believe the more experience a surgeon has with a disease, the better they are in dealing with patients with the disease. If they have years of experience, you can probably be sure that they have seen almost every type of patient presentation there could be. I know I saw a difference between the two urologists I had seen only because I knew one had 20 plus years in dealing with kidney cancer and the other didn't.
Internet Chat Boards. There are many chat rooms and discussion boards for virtually every type of disease. I believe these boards have value because they let patients with the same disease offer emotional support for each other. These boards also let patients who are in the advanced stages of disease compare treatment protocols and offer possible solutions in dealing with the many side effects of radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Other than that, I'd take any medical advice from a chat board with a grain of salt. There are exceptions to that rule as I know of one doctor who is considered a leading expert in carcinoids who regularly answers medical questions and offers support to patients (and stresses at the same time, how important it to see their own doctor) via a Internet mailing list.
Not the experience you want. I know I got better at researching a medical issue as I got diagnosed. Its not the experience you want to acquire but one has to learn how to deal with a serious medical issue. I felt tons of pressure during my dealing with kidney cancer but dealt with the neuroendocrine tumor with virtually no pressure.
When I received the letter stating that I had a neuroendocrine tumor, the first thing I did was hit the Internet for information. These tumors are considered rare and there is not much information out there. My preferred method for searching for information is Google Scholar and Pubmed. I also used the Johns Hopkins Pancreatic Cancer Website and Discussion Board for reference. I also browsed the websites of leading hospitals that dealt with pancreatic cancer as well as support organizations like PanCan and Pancreatica.org.
One thing I do is research every doctor I see. I like to know where they went to school, how long they have been out of school, where they did there residency, if they did any special training or fellowships and if they are board certified. I also search pubmed to find out what interests they have if any. The hospitals where they work usually have a website with physician profiles also.
While I wasn't to thrilled with my first general surgeons beside manner, I was satisfied with all the tests and options he offered me. My mother is a retired operating room nurse and one piece of information she had given me was that some surgeons have the worse bedside manner and personality but they might also have the best hands when it comes to performing surgery. I also knew he was previously associated with a hospital with an excellent reputation in dealing with pancreatic tumors and cancer before I asked him for his opinion regarding the neuroendocrine tumor finding so I knew he had experience. For me, it came down to me not agreeing with his opinion and also the fact that I won't follow anybody blindly when they don't answer my questions. I just didn't have the comfort level I needed to continue under his care because I wasn't on the same page as him.
I had researched pubmed and didn't find many cases that were watched, I actually only found one. When I finally got my hands on the report from the EUS FNA, my tumor was measured at 1cm and in the pancreatic tail. I found cases on pubmed where resection was performed on tumors that were half that size. I also used the National Cancer Institute Guidelines as a reference that recommends surgical resection for neuroendocrine tumors bigger than 1cm.
Part of the first general surgeons opinion what that I was a candidate to have the procedure done laparoscopically and that my tumor was less than 2cm. I don't assume anything as I didn't have the EUS FNA report yet but I figured the tumor was obviously less than 2cm and in the tail of my pancreas. That meant distal pancreatomy.
I did the same thing I did with my kidney cancer. I used the opinion of the first surgeon I saw to research a recomendation of laparoscopic distal pancreatomy. Let me tell you, neuroendocrine tumors are as rare as they say because I found hardly any patients who had a distal pancreatomy.
I again used part of the first general surgeons opinion where he stated he didn't think my tumor was malignant. I researched pubmed and was happy to realize that I was a candidate for a laparoscopic procedure because my tumor was probably benign. I also searched the pancreatic discussion board and Johns Hopkins and found a few references of patients who had the procedure laparoscopically (one didn't have a good outcome and stated they wished they had an open procedure) and other board members who posted there opinion that they wouldn't have any procedure done laparoscopically only for the fact that the pancreas was being operated on. I on the other hand embrace new technology and procedures and if there was a chance to have this procedure done laparoscopically, I wouldn't hesitate. I researched pubmed and found a few studies, one being a study of 46 patients from Brisbane, Austrailia who had laparoscopic distal pancreatomy performed. It was clear to me that the risks and complications were close to being as equal or better for the patient for an laparoscopic procedure versus an open.
While I've never had an open procedure performed and hope I never do, I was a caregiver for my best friend who had an open procedure performed and saw what he went through in terms of pain and recovery time from the open procedure. I had undergone a laparoscopic procedure for my kidney cancer and was pleasantly suprised how fast I recovered from the laparoscopic procedure. If I had the option for laparoscopic surgery, I wouldn't hesitate for a minute.
I had already picked out Johns Hopkins as the place I would go for a second opinion based on their being a high volume institution for pancreatic cancer and tumors. I knew that meant they do a ton of whipples but figured it was still the place to go for a distal. When I called the nurse coordinator of the Pancreas Multidisciplinary Clinic I asked about the clinic and also about a direct referral to a surgeon. She gave me the option of both and explained how my case would be reviewed by a team of experts in dealing with pancreatic tumors and cancers. Even though I had a surgeon picked out, I figured I couldn't go wrong with a team of doctors reviewing my case.
I had reviewed the profiles of the surgeons on the Pancreas Multidisciplinary Clinics website and zeroed in on one surgeon whose specialty included minimally invasive surgery which meant laparoscopic. His profile also mentioned he completed advanced training in pancreatic surgery with Dr. Cameron who happens to have a great reputation among patients for his ability to perform the whipple procedure. If I had decided to bypass the clinic, I would have requested an appointment with that surgeon.
One side story is that my next door neighbor also had surgery to resect a neuroendocrine tumor approximately 4 years ago. I know, what are the odds of a neighbor having the same type of rare tumor. His tumor was located in the head of the pancreas and he went to Johns Hopkins to have the whipple done. His surgeon was Dr. Cameron who has the experience of performing many a whipple procedure. My friend and neighbors lifemate can talk your ear off. She told me a story where she had a bunch of questions to ask Dr. Cameron. Dr. Cameron came in the exam room, told them exactly what was going to happen, which included a good prognosis, and ended up leaving before she could ask her questions. If that maneuver could install enough confidence to keep her quiet (you have to know her), thats all I would ever need to know about Dr. Cameron.
As it turns out, I was assigned the surgeon who I had zeroed in on if I had bypassed the clinic. I knew all I needed to know and had no doubt in my mind when he came into the exam room with a recommendation of surgery. There is still the fact that you either will trust or not trust someone and that is very instinctive. Preperation and doing your homework can only help making that decision of trust. I have to admit I was still a little surprised for the recommendation for the surgery only because the physician who did my history and physical was very convincing when she mentioned that they would probably recommend a watch and wait approach.
When patients find out they have cancer or tumor, many will rush to have surgery to get it out of their body as fast as they can. That can lead to poor choices regarding their providers and lead to bad outcomes. I take the approach of finding out all I can about the disease and then find a provider that has a ton of experience with my disease. I'm responsible for my own care and I try to put myself in the best position for a positive outcome. I know if I do that, I can live with the outcome, good or bad, with no regrets or second guessing.
You can call this the diary of a madman but I use the Internet and do my homework when it comes to my medical care. I believe I've used the resources provided by the Internet effectively. Of course, if I run into a roadblock or have a question, I write it down and ask my medical provider.
| I never thought that taking a shower could be physically draining. I was totally drained and wanted to go right to sleep after taking my shower late yesterday afternoon. My dinner tray came at 4:30pm. I'm still on a clear liquid diet. Let me tell you, the only thing worse than sugar free lemon jello is regular strawberry jello, especially since I switched to sugar free jello years ago. It was like eating pure sugar, not pleasant. In the past, when I've been in the hospital and hungry, I'd eat anything even if it tasted bad. I passed on dinner last night. The only thing worse than regular strawberry jello is the sugar free lime jello I asked for this morning. I did eat more this morning and as I am writing this, my lunch tray arrived and its solid food. Last night I went through 3 gowns in the matter of 2 hours and a bunch of pillow cases. They were soaked with sweat. My drain was also leaking onto my gown and sheets. I told the staff and they placed a bandage on around the drain. By the time the evening nurse came around to take my vitals, I had the chills and couldn't stop shaking. This seems to be par for the course for me but as long as my high temperature continues to drop, I don't have any concerns. I felt pretty good this morning when the doctors came to visit. I was told that I would possibly be released tomorrow so I'm happy about that. I also questioned the lead doctor about my pneumonia vaccination that I received on 8/25 from my PCP. He was going to call my PCP to verify. As it stands now, I'll need two other vaccinations since I no longer have a spleen. I've already done my homework on those issues and am not concerned about living without a spleen. I had a visitor this morning. My friend Don (pictured) came by for a short visit to say hello and was surprised that I was looking so well. I met Don via my blog as we are both RCC survivors. I went for a long trip around the hospital and even went outside this morning. It felt great to get outside but I did feel a little fatigued afterwards. I just finished my solid food lunch. I ate slowly and didn't eat everything. So far I don't have any nausea but I figure there is a good chance of it since everyone has mentioned that I shouldn't be in a rush for solid food. I know I just had surgery and it takes a while for the pancreas to "bounce back" but I figure, in for a penny, in for a pound. |
![]() |
| My temperature was high early this morning and they took blood cultures and a chest x-ray this morning. Today was an up and down day. I didn't get much sleep last night and was on my way out my rooms door to go for a walk when the residents showed up. They removed the bandages to reveal streri-strips that will eventually fall off over time. I have 5 more trocars incisions and they feel like they have been sealed with glue. I was put on a clear liquid diet and had some chicken broth for breakfast this morning along with some apple juice. For lunch I had only a tiny portion of an italian ice before I got sick to my stomach. I asked and received some medication for nausea. I've been experiencing alternating chills and sweats. My last reading was 102 degrees. One of the doctors was in the room for that reading and I was told to use the spriometer. I've been very diligent in using the spirometer and I don't want to experience Atelectasis again. I was told I could take a shower but wanted to wait until I felt halfway decent. |
![]() |
| I had an endoscopy procedure today at Johns Hopkins in preparation for my distal pancreatomy (oh, forgot spleen per serving, I hope, it seems to have a mind of its own as it doesn't want to get cut out). Everything went like clockwork as the tumor was localized and tattooed. The gastronenterologist was very approachable and staff treated me well and were pleasant to work with. The gastroenterologist answered my questions as I tend to go research every procedure I undergo thoroughly. I had asked about the different types of dye and the possible side effects. He knew his craft as he stated possible complications and also the probability percentages of those complications. He was a man after my own heart. One item I liked about this procedure was the different type of anesthesia used as compared to my last procedure. They used a short lasting sedative called propofol. I awoke about 45 minutes after I was sedated and it was like I had a short nap. I was happy since the last time I was very sleepy and not all there mentally. Just as with my last procedure, no pain, no sore throat or upset stomach. I'd say it was a success as the tumor needed to be localized and tattooed for tomorrows surgery. I have to report at 5:30am. I'm staying at a local hotel about 3 miles away and I've already ordered a cab for 5:00am tomorrow. As luck would have it, I ran into Nurse Coleman from the Pancreatic Multidisciplinary clinic in the corridor and had a very pleasant 15-20 minute conversation. On a side note, my PCP asked me for an opinion on the gastroenterologist that did my procedure at Geisinger. While I was disappointed that I wasn't told about the mass after the procedure, he did follow up with me and I was very satisfied that I benefited from his experience and training and told my PCP I wouldn't hesitate to use him if I ever needed another endoscopy procedure at Geisinger. So far, so good. My goal was to put myself in the best position possible for a positive outcome. I believe I have accomplished that in traveling to Johns Hopkins. |
![]() |
I've decided to add video to my blog. If all goes well regarding some upcoming diagnostic tests, I'll be scheduled to have a spleen preserving distal pancreatomy at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland. There isn't much information on this type of surgery on the internet, patient experiences or the surgery itself. I had previously watched multiple surgeries on or-live.com but they don't have a distal pancreatomy in the archives.
When I had my kidney cryoablation surgery, I asked my sister to update my blog for me. That didn't work out as anticipated so I've decided to take my laptop with me this time. If they have Internet Access (I might just subscribe or rent a wireless broadband device for my laptop if they don't), I will update my blog while I'm in the hospital.
![]() |
![]() |
|
I just thought I would show the before and after MRI images of the tumor that was on my right kidney. These images were captured post contrast. As you can see, the image on the left is before my cryoablation surgery and the tumor enhances (is white). The image on the right is 3 months post cryoablation surgery and as you can see, the tumor does not enhance (is black) which means the tumor cells are dead. | |
| I now am now without a stent for the first time since the beginning of March. I don't know if I'm just a freak but I never had any pain with it, just minor discomfort when I exercised or played golf. When I did my research on stents, I read many a story of patients in constant pain after having a stent inserted. I took out my temporary stent (pictured right) two days after the procedure. I went back to my regular workout yesterday. It was oh so sweet not to feel discomfort 10 minutes into my workout and then have gross hematuria afterwords and basically be tired for the rest of the day. My only problem during my workout was I started to get short of breath after 25 minutes and I figured it was because it was almost 6 days since my last workout and I do tend to go at a fast pace. I don't take much credence in the pulse rate monitors on the exercise equipment but I was shocked when it went to 179 since the highest reading I've ever seen for myself on those was in the 140's. I then started feeling a little discomfort in my jaw which is the same symptom I experienced when I had my heart attack. I wanted to see if my pulse rate was high so I switched to a treadmill and my pulse rate read 152. Normally, after switching from the elliptical trainer to the treadmill, my pulse rate is 112 max. I was considering a trip to the emergency room but when I didn't turn white, I figured I wasn't having a heart attack. I was concerned for the rest of the day as I did feel "funny" in the chest a few times but I never had any chest pain. Its now the next day and my blood pressure has been acceptable but my pulse rate has been over 100 so I just sent a message to my PCP that includes readings for the last week. |
![]() |
| I don't think I would have ever considered having kidney stones a good thing.....until now. While I can't be sure that my kidney stones caused my hematuria, its a good bet that they did which sent me to the emergency room where a CT Scan revealed the tumor on my right kidney. Its time to say good bye to my little friends. One of my stones is pictured to the right (top photo). Until my visit, I only thought I had one stone but I also was told that besides the stone thats in my left ureter, there is one in my left kidney as well. I met today with the urologist who will be performing the ureteroscopy with lithotripsy. I do my research on any professional I'm going to see and I was very comfortable (OK - I admit I was impressed) with this urologists career accomplishments to date which includes giving continuing medical education courses for the American Urological Association. I do try to talk to other patients first but the only reference I was able find was on a another patients blog with a comment that stated this doctor "scared" the spouse of that patient. I was very satisfied with how our appointment unfolded. The procedure was explained to me as well as my short term and long term care regarding kidney stone management and kidney function. I was definitely hearing confidence in the doctors voice as my plan of action was explained and any questions and concerns I had were addressed to my satisfaction. I come prepared with a list of questions but didn't have to ask any at the end of the appointment since the doctor was very thorough. It didn't take long for me to trust the doctor. I appreciated the doctors straight forward communication with me. I really couldn't see how this doctor could scare anybody. My procedure is scheduled for May 22nd and I should be home that day. Hopefully there will be no complications. I'm really beginning to see a light at the end of the tunnel. The only issue slowing me down now is the stent that I have. I had an abdominal x-ray and you can pretty much see what a stent looks like from the two x-rays seen at the right. After the procedure is done, I'll have another temporary stent which should only be left in for a week at the most. I'll then get the chance to heal and hopefully the discomfort I feel after doing my aerobic exercises will be gone as well. Bye Bye my little friends!!!!!!!!!!!! |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| I've communicated with many people (friends, family, fellow kidney cancer patients and their caregivers) as a result of my blog. I recently had the opportunity and pleasure to meet a friend that was made as a result of two diagnoses of kidney cancer. My friends name is Don and his wife's name is Jenny. I must say they are two of the nicest people I have ever met. Don was diagnosed with kidney cancer and like most patients, started searching the internet for information. Don found my blog via the google search engine. Don found my positive approach in dealing with kidney cancer inspirational. I told Don I was just like everyone else (a wreck) when they hear the diagnosis "kidney cancer". I was very fortunate to have many friends who provided much needed support and positive attitudes. I was given a diagnosis of kidney cancer on December 7, 2007. I was already 6 weeks in dealing with it when Don found my blog and realized he wasn't alone in how he felt in dealing with kidney cancer. By the time he read my blog, I had already accepted my diagnosis and had a positive attitude. Don chose a well respected surgeon from Johns Hopkins and was fortunate to be on the fast track when it came from diagnosis to surgery. His surgeon had an unexpected opening in his schedule and offered it to Don. I believe it was less than 10 days from diagnosis to surgery. Since Don had his surgery first, he made sure to share his experiences of his recovery with me to give me an idea of what to expect. We exchanged emails and chatted on the phone a few times but the biggest surprise was a "care package" that Don sent me that was waiting for me when I was released from the hospital. There was a huge box sitting in my family room when I got home from the hospital. There were about 12 individually wrapped packages with instructions to open one per day. All were thoughtful and witty. One package included three pairs of pajamas. How ironic since many a night I had to change my clothes 2-3 times because of night sweats. Other packages included music CD's, movie DVD's, books to pass the time as I recovered from surgery. There were also gifts that were subtle hints (like a package of prunes) of what some "goals" were. Don and Jenny usually travel to Florida once a winter. Their trip was originally canceled by Don's surgery and recovery but decided to make the trip when Don felt up to it. I happened to get the OK from my surgeon to travel and made it to Florida last Monday. We decided to meet for dinner. My best friend Bruce joined us and we all had a great time. Don wanted to hug me and he got his wish although I was afraid to hug to hard since I was afraid I would hurt him. Jenny had liked my goatee (that I shaved off) and Don was amazed at how young I was and how much weight I had lost from a picture I had sent him previously. We met in a crowded restaurant but it didn't take 5 minutes before we both lifted up our shirts to show our battle scars. His were about 3-4 weeks older than mine and I was happy that his were hardly noticeable. I knew from previous surgeries that incisions are usually hard to notice after time. I enjoyed the company and don't mind saying that it was a nice treat to have a splurge meal since I stick to my heart healthy/diabetic friendly diet. We all chatted like we knew each other for years. I know I will keep in touch as I am interested in Don's progress and friendship and Jenny is such a supportive person. (Sorry Don, but don't get jealous when I email your wife) When we exchanged photos initially I could tell there was something special between them and I was right, they were definitely made for each other. We've already discussed about meeting next year and I hope to have them at my house for a couple of days or at least dinner and maybe a boat ride. One item that I am grateful for is that we both have a great prognosis for living with kidney cancer. Even though kidney cancer sucks, its great to know you have a friend and that you don't have to be alone. |
![]() ![]() |
I finally made it back to Florida. It will be a short vacation as I have a regularly scheduled doctors appointment with my PCP next month.
My flight actually arrived 30 minutes early. I had Gracie bring Sydney over to the house before she came to pick Bruce and I up. It was great receiving a very warm and wet welcome from her when I opened the door and said "Where's my baby girl". She came running and the kisses were nonstop for the next 15 minutes and of course I had to lay on the bed and rub her belly for a little while after that.
I feel pretty strong and actually quite normal. Its been two weeks since my surgery and I have no discomfort on my right flank. All the extra fluid that I was given when I was in the hospital is now gone. I weighed myself yesterday morning and I came in at 189. The swelling is almost completely gone in the areas of my incisions. Its almost been anti-climatic since I expected the healing process to be more painful and last longer.
The only gift that keeps on giving is the stent that was inserted on my left side. Its like having a mini kidney stone attack almost every time I go to urinate. I've experienced one kidney stone attack prior to its insertion and it wasn't as painful as others have made it out to be. To me, it just feels like a minor inconvenience when I feel I have to relieve myself. I know its only going to be inside me for 6 months before its taken out. I know I have a high threshold for pain but as of right now, its no problem.
I slept pretty well and it felt great to walk Sydney in the morning. I had my usual breakfast which she knows she is going to get some of my breakfast. It was great having those eyes look up at me again.
I then went to the golf club and chatted with some of my friends in the office. I then went to the grill room where the group of friends I usually play golf with were just coming in from playing 18. It was great seeing them again and just sitting there shooting the breeze.
Dr. Rukstalis told me that I could play golf 3 days after surgery. The way I felt after 3 days I thought he was crazy. I figured I would play it cautious and only put two of my golf clubs in the trunk of the car when I left the house this morning. I went to the driving range after chatting with my friends in the clubhouse. I started off on the chipping green to make it easy on myself. I then went to one of the driving range stalls and knocked about 50 balls out of the bucket. I did my normal stretching routine and took my wedge out. I told myself to take it easy and I did on my first couple of swings. I felt no discomfort so I said what the heck and went full speed. I spent the next 15 minutes hitting balls at full speed with no pain or discomfort. Its now 5 hours later and I still have no pain or discomfort so I'd say it was a success.
I've already signed up to play with my friends on Thursday morning. I plan on going to the YMCA tomorrow morning and attempting my regular aerobic working. Then after lunch, I plan on playing 9 holes to see how I hold up. I also plan on signing up for Mens Day on Friday but that depends how I feel tomorrow afternoon.
Right now, I couldn't be any more satisfied with my progress after having surgery.
![]() |
Kevin with Dr. Rukstalis. I shaved the beard off because I looked 10 years older than him, now I look 10 years younger. |
![]() |
Kevin with Dr.K on the left and Dr. R on the right. Good sports as they were a little camera shy at first. |
![]() |
Kevin, resting in the afternoon after having surgery in the morning. I think I'm looking and feeling pretty good at this point as I had only been awake for a few hours. |
![]() |
Kevin resting during the afternoon after having surgery in the morning. Again, I'm feeling pretty good at this point a. |
![]() |
Kevin and Bruce, day after surgery. This is where the pain and chills are kicking in and I start having complications. |
![]() |
Kevin and Bruce, 4 days day of surgery. |
![]() |
Kevin and Mom, 4 days day of surgery. |
![]() |
Kevin, day of surgery. You see the small incisions used for the robotic laproscopic surgery. Glue is used to seal them. My right side is a little swollen but I only have discomfort when I use the spirometer. I haven't had the need for any pain medication since I was discharged. |
![]() |
Kevin walking the halls. I received the nickname squeaky since the wheels on the IV transport squeaked as I walked down the hall. Everyone knew who was coming. |
![]() |
TUG, the hospitals robotic delivery system. I believe it is used to deliver meds from the pharmacy to the nurses stations. It does everything, it calls for empty elevators, has voice capability to let nearby people what directive it is trying to execute. It stops when it senses a possible obstacle. Impressive, but my mother was too impressed as she had to run outside to see it in action every time it passed my room. |
![]() |
Kevin, the day after surgery, getting transported for a chest x-ray. |
![]() |
Kevin, four days after surgery. I'm not in pain as I'm trying not to laugh as my loving mother tells a joke. Revenge will be sweet as we are at MY HOUSE and I can use all those nice things mothers use like "not while you are under my roof". |
![]() |
For my friends in Florida who haven't witnessed the phenomenon known as snow. |
![]() |
Sydney, my English Springer Spaniel who I adopted from a rescue about 7 years ago. I miss her but I know shes having a good time with Gracie and Katie. |
![]() |
Katie, Bruce and Gracies English Bull Dog. I think she is butt ugly but so lovable. She may look menacing but she is so person friendly. She's had more surgeries than me. Probably having a great time with Sydney now. |
I must say that I feel like a new man today after a good nights rest. My mind is definitely clearer now that I'm no longer taking pain medication. I do feel "recharged" so to say and ready to keep traveling down the road that I'm on.
I'd like to believe that I'm pretty good at analyzing the situation I'm in but have come to realize the my memory of events during my hospital stay are not clear at best and full of gaps.
There is one item that I'm sure of and that is my decision to put my trust in Dr. Rukstalis.
I had major surgery and then complications. I'd still like to believe I'm 18 and superman but that just isn't the case anymore. I received excellent medical care while I was in distress and my medical team answered the challenge and I'm home today because of it.
Dr. Rukstalis had me pegged correctly when he told me I'm the type that wants to know everything. I'll get to ask him about my complications when I have a followup with him this coming Tuesday.
There are a few other items that I'm sure of. You either trust your doctors or you don't. I trusted the chief resident and Dr. K. If I ever had to switch urologists and they were in my area, I'd be at their door real quick. Besides, as doctors go they were kind of hip and its just a bonus if you like them besides trusting them. I also trusted the three internal medicine doctors who treated me. Their level of care only reaffirmed my decision to swith PCP's in the middle of this ordeal.
Probably the only concern on my mind are the results of the MRI of my spleen. I don't particularly like the combination of PCP and urologist for a consult on something usually considered "general surgery". I'd like to get the results from my PCP as I'd like to see how he handles giving news out. I'll be glad to finally get the results as the only person who keeps asking me about the results is my mother. I have the attitude of taking care of the present problem and then deal with the next as I know I have to recover before I can tackle anything else. My mother has a history of having my leg amputated, my kidney removed so I can only imagine whats going through her mind now LOL.

| Its been a mostly uneventful weekend. The snow came on Friday afternoon and we received about 3-4 inches locally. My only dilemma was that I had promised to pick up my friends/neighbors from the airport that night. They were coming back from a month long vacation in Arizona. Normally, I would be picking them up from the airport in Fort Myers, FL as my friend is my guest in my golf clubs Member/Guest tournament. I had a little fun with them on Wednesday as I sent a picture via cell phone of Sydney (they love her) and a picture of their house with all the snow around it as a friendly reminder that they coming back to the harsh reality of winter in State College. Their flight was not scheduled to get into State College until 8:00 pm. The snow plows came through my development around 6:30 pm so I figured it couldn't be that bad. Its probably been over 10 years since I've driven in the snow but I should have returned to my garage when I had trouble getting up two hills in my development. A rear wheel drive Lincoln Town Car is probably not the best vehicle for driving in the snow. The roads were far more dangerous than I had anticipated but I continued anyway. The fun started as I was going to merge on the 322-bypass. The entrance ramp has an incline and I was probably going a little to fast but when I got to the top of the entrance ramp, I fish tailed, lost control and ended up doing a 360+ and came to rest facing the wrong way at the end of the entrance ramp. Fortunately, no other vehicles were around at the time but it did take me about 5 minutes to get it turned around as traffic passed. I had no other trouble but it was still a little nerve racking. My friends and neighbors know my condition and that I have my surgery scheduled for Tuesday. They know I don't want to do anything that could get me sick and possibly postpone my surgery. Before I had a chance to even think about clearing my driveway of the snow, 3 of my neighbors took care of it. I'm very fortunate to have friends like this. All my friends have offered their assistance if I need it and knowing that kind of help is available has made my experience much easier to handle. I also contacted my primary care physician on Friday. I let him know that my blood sugar levels were getting to low. I was testing in the 60's and 70's two hours after dinner and a dosage of my medication. One of my goals is to get into better physical shape and to reduce the amount of medication I have to take to control my diabetes. I have also made lifestyle changes to my diet and upgraded my exercise program. I had a goal to be under 200 pounds before my surgery and I weighed in at 197 yesterday. My primary care physician reduced my diabetes medication in half and I am very happy with that. My next regularly scheduled visit with him is in April and I'm confident that my LDL will be back in line and that he will reduce my cholesterol medication. I also sent my primary care physician a message this morning regarding MRI I had to further evaluate my spleen. I have not received the results of the MRI and I was hoping to get the results before my surgery. I'll be posting one more time before my surgery on Tuesday morning from my hotel room. I don't know if I could use my laptop in the hospital so I will be having a guest writer (my sister) update my blog with the results of my surgery so my family and friends will be able to find out what procedure my doctor performed and how I'm recovering. |
| I'd been looking forward to this day for a long time. I was going to have some very important tests to determine the status of my kidney cancer. Since I was first diagnosed with kidney cancer in December, I've gone through a gambit of emotional states. There's been denial, why me, deal with it, acceptance, fight and live with it. The support I have received from family, friends, medical professionals and other cancer patients has made me realize that the emotional states I went through was just a natural progression after hearing the words "you have cancer". The one thing I never did was second guess or regret any of my lifestyle choices (smoking, diet, work habits) when I was in my 20's or 30's that most likely contributed to my current diagnosis. My first test today was a bone scan. I arrived at the hospital an hour before my 11:00 am first appointment where they would inject a radioactive tracer. I would then have to wait 2 hours before any pictures were taken to give the tracer time to get absorbed by my bones. When I came back the scan took about 40 minutes. My second test was a CT scan of my chest with contrast. The technician was preparing to insert an IV to a vein at my wrist when I stopped her cold and asked her to use a vein by my elbow. This whole test took about 10 minutes. I then received a suprise visit from one of the radiologists in nuclear medicine. I was asked to come back to have a few images redone from my bone scan. I was a little concerned as he explained there was a spot on my right scapula that they needed to explore further to determine if it was an artifact, anomaly or an issue to be concerned about. Geisinger Medical Center is a teaching hospital. Most of the professionals I worked with in radiology were on the young side. I found it rather refreshing to be surrounded by young professionals and interns who were eager to teach and learn as well as make sure all my needs were met. When I came back to radiology, I was put on a different scanner. I had drawn a crowd of about four or five people who were interested in why I was getting scanned again. I assumed most of them were interns and had a little fun with them as I asked them for $1 if they wanted to watch and for $5 if they wanted me to put on a show. The scan took about 10 minutes and I spoke with the radiologist afterwards who assured me everything was ok. My next appointment is with my surgeon, Dr. Rukstalis (pictured with me on the right). We were going to discuss the results of my tests and review my plan of action. During my first visit with Dr. Rukstalis on January 18th, I was quite aware that I had to make a decision to trust and have faith in him and his staff. I did my research on him and even listened to a podcast of him being interviewed on the topic of how to choose a urologist. He made enough of an impression on me where he did gain my faith and trust. It has been a long wait from my first visit to this point. Probably the most important factor that kept me at ease during the wait was my faith and trust in Dr. Rukstalis. The man just reeks of enough confidence for two when he opens his mouth to speak. His experience with my disease really showed during my first visit and he only reaffirmed that during my second visit. During my first visit I was doing everything I could to get a read on him. I had no need to try and read him this time as I had total confidence in him. We go over the bone scan and chest scans first. I'm clear on both counts. I told him his credibility with me just tripled but in reality it only reconfirmed my trust and belief in him. I would not have lost any faith and trust in him if he had been wrong as he did put a probability on his assessment that I was clear. We then discuss the stent that is going to be inserted to take care of the non-obstructing kidney stone that is positioned outside my left kidney. He explains the procedure and why we are dealing with the issue along with the pros and cons of what could happen. I was told that the usual maximum time the stent could be left in is six months if I tolerate it. He was a little hesitant to tell me what would happen if the stone did not pass but I think I surprised him when I asked him if he would have to go up and grab it if it hadn't passed by then. We then go over the plan of action on the tumor in my right kidney. I had the CD of the MRI study of my kidney that was taken the day before. He commented that I was the type that wants to know everything and he was right about that. He loads the study on one of the computers and we start talking about it. I must say that I like viewing this type of information on CD versus film. I understand Dr. Rukstalis's explanations better since I can actually see the tumor and organs rotate on the screen as we go from picture to picture. I was hoping to get a better idea of where the tumor was in relation to my renal vein. Dr. Rukstalis pulled up a picture that showed exactly that and he explained that it looked that there was plenty of margin to where a partial nephrectomy could be performed. I also realize that the partial may not be feasible and that I may undergo the cryoablation or even a total nephrectomy. I know Dr. Rukstalis has to make the call when they actually get to my tumor but I have total confidence in his experience and ability. I had quite a few questions written down but most were answered during his explanations and I only had to ask a few. I was told that I would most likely be released from the hospital on Wedensday if everything went ok. I was surprised that he told me I could play golf 3 days after but said that it would probably hurt like hell. I'm the aggressive type but I have no problem in letting my incisions heal for a time before I try anything that put me at risk for further injury. I don't think I'll try lifting weights for a while but would like to get back to my aerobic exercises quickly. My next stop was to get inverviewed by anesthesiology. A nurse basically profiled me so that the anesthesiologist knows my medical history. I'll get to meet the anesthesiologist Tuesday morning. I've had surgery before and general anesthesia but I always get a chill as the last words they usually tell you before they leave you is what bad things can happen to you while under anesthesia. Afterwards, I went over to the local inn across from the hospital and booked two rooms from Monday and Tuesday night. It was a long day, not mentally draining but I crashed and fell asleep around 9:00 pm as I got home around 8:30 pm. I'm feeling great now as everything is coming together. I was concerned in the time frame from when I was first diagnosed to my surgery but am satisifed at the moment since it doesn't look to have had a negative impact on my condition. |
![]() |